The article is a one year old pro-tapestry piece (August 2005) for their upcoming 4.0 version so of course it would try to beat down other popular frameworks for attention. Since it is so old we can hardly call it "yet another" plus, it is too old to consider changes in the Struts, WebWork and JSF fronts like:
a) Struts 1.X updates this past year b) Struts 1.3 (now in beta, then just a thought) c) The time it takes to split off Tiles into a standalone d) How JSF has matured with the recent JSF 1.2_02 spec update and RI release e) How Shale has greatly stabilized and what it can add to JSF f) How Facelets makes JSF XXX times easier g) Struts 2.0 which integrates so much "Struts" with "Webwork" plus the 2.0 "JSF" compatibility and communication features for dual-use sites Yes, I am nitpicking but if you point out another death article as if it is news then we should have some contrary perspective. Besides, I personally don't like Tapestry or Wicket though I've read through the tutorials to give them a fair chance, probably about a year ago. Regards, David -----Original Message----- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Elhanan Maayan Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 9:36 AM To: user@struts.apache.org Subject: yet another struts eulogy? this: http://www.theserverside.com/tt/articles/article.tss?l=JSFTapestry so the question continues with new applications go for struts 1.3 learn webwork 2.2 (webwork in action, or developing web apps with lightweight framework ) and then go to struts 2.0 (struts in ww clothing?) use J.S.F commit suiciide by using shale for production? use tapestry with almost not vendor support? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
