Got it... had to explicitly set the Content-Type of the request to application/x-www-form-urlencoded on the XMLHttpRequest object. Didn't even occur to me because I set the method to POST, didn't even consider that might not be sufficient. Weird thing is, I know I have code where I POST but don't set the header and it works, not sure why these nested names would be different.
Well, should it come up for anyone else, there you go :) Frank -- Frank W. Zammetti Founder and Chief Software Architect Omnytex Technologies http://www.omnytex.com AIM/Yahoo: fzammetti MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Author of "Practical Ajax Projects With Java Technology" (2006, Apress, ISBN 1-59059-695-1) Java Web Parts - http://javawebparts.sourceforge.net Supplying the wheel, so you don't have to reinvent it! On Fri, September 22, 2006 4:48 pm, Frank W. Zammetti wrote: > Quick update: it has something to do with the fact that its an AJAX > request at the end... or because its a POST, one or the other... I built a > URL with the parameters as a query string, and it worked fine... I don't > know what it is yet yet, exploring now... the request looks identical > aside from method, which shouldn't matter, AFAIKT, but something is > obviously bad with it... will let you know when I figure it out... > > Frank > > > -- > Frank W. Zammetti > Founder and Chief Software Architect > Omnytex Technologies > http://www.omnytex.com > AIM/Yahoo: fzammetti > MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Author of "Practical Ajax Projects With Java Technology" > (2006, Apress, ISBN 1-59059-695-1) > Java Web Parts - http://javawebparts.sourceforge.net > Supplying the wheel, so you don't have to reinvent it! > > On Fri, September 22, 2006 4:35 pm, Jiang, Peiyun wrote: >> Can you just use simple objects in the form? >> >> public class MyActionForm extends ActionForm { >> AnotherActionForm1 af1; >> AnotherActionForm2 af2; >> >> MyActionForm() { >> af1 = new SimpleObject1AsAnotherActionForm1(); >> af2 = new SimpleObject2AsAnotherActionForm2(); >> } >> } >> >> Access: >> <%= masterForm.af1.field1 %> >> >> Peiyun >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Frank W. Zammetti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: September 22, 2006 4:23 PM >> To: Struts Users Mailing List >> Cc: Struts Users Mailing List >> Subject: Re: Nested form beans >> >> >> On Fri, September 22, 2006 3:59 pm, Hubert Rabago wrote: >>> I can't see anything that would cause your problem. >>> I guess if it were me, I'd fire up my debugger and start stepping >>> through some code. >>> Sorry. >> >> Yeah, that's the next step. Was hoping to avoid it with an easy answer, >> but that's the way it goes sometimes :) >> >>> All I can say at this point is that I know what you're doing is >>> possible cause that's how FormDef does nested beans. >> >> Actually, that's a pretty big help in and of itself... I wasn't frankly >> aware the subbeans would get populated, so knowing it *should* work at >> least means I'm not on a wild goose chase. Thanks for the effort, I >> definitely appreciate it! >> >>> Hubert >> >> Frank >> >>> On 9/22/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> Hehe, way ahead of you :) I put logging in every method... >>>> constructors, >>>> getters setter, all three forms. Here's the output: >>>> >>>> MasterForm constructor >>>> Tab1Form constructor >>>> Tab2Form constructor >>>> --NOW IN JSP-- >>>> MasterForm getTab1Form() = [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> MasterForm getTab2Form() = [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> getting field1 = null >>>> getting field2 = null >>>> >>>> Notice the fields don't get set, nor do the subbeans get set on the >>>> containing bean. The MasterForm constructor instantiates Tab1Form and >>>> Tab2Form, as the output indicates. >>>> >>>> Frank >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Frank W. Zammetti >>>> Founder and Chief Software Architect >>>> Omnytex Technologies >>>> http://www.omnytex.com >>>> AIM/Yahoo: fzammetti >>>> MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> Author of "Practical Ajax Projects With Java Technology" >>>> (2006, Apress, ISBN 1-59059-695-1) >>>> Java Web Parts - http://javawebparts.sourceforge.net >>>> Supplying the wheel, so you don't have to reinvent it! >>>> >>>> On Fri, September 22, 2006 2:53 pm, Hubert Rabago wrote: >>>> > It still sounds like Struts is getting nulls for the subbeans when >>>> it >>>> > tries to populate subbean.fieldX. Put some more logging, this time >>>> in >>>> > the getters for the subbean in MasterForm, and log what it's >>>> > returning. >>>> > >>>> > Hubert >>>> > >>>> > On 9/22/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >> As a follow-up, I threw some logging in the field1 and field2 >>>> setters >>>> in >>>> >> the subbeans... they don't appear to ever get called. I don't have >>>> to >>>> >> do >>>> >> anything special to tell Struts I'm using nested beans, do I? I >>>> didn't >>>> >> think so... >>>> >> >>>> >> Frank >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> -- >>>> >> Frank W. Zammetti >>>> >> Founder and Chief Software Architect >>>> >> Omnytex Technologies >>>> >> http://www.omnytex.com >>>> >> AIM/Yahoo: fzammetti >>>> >> MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >> Author of "Practical Ajax Projects With Java Technology" >>>> >> (2006, Apress, ISBN 1-59059-695-1) >>>> >> Java Web Parts - http://javawebparts.sourceforge.net >>>> >> Supplying the wheel, so you don't have to reinvent it! >>>> >> >>>> >> On Fri, September 22, 2006 2:47 pm, Frank W. Zammetti wrote: >>>> >> > Hi Chris.. thanks for the suggestion, I gave that a shot at one >>>> point >>>> >> > actually... what I get is now the fields in the subforms (I guess >>>> >> that's >>>> >> > as good a term as any!) don't get set... >>>> >> > >>>> >> > masterForm = [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >> > tab1Form = [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >> > tab2Form = [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >> > field1 = null >>>> >> > field2 = null >>>> >> > >>>> >> > That's what I see in my final JSP output. >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Frank >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > -- >>>> >> > Frank W. Zammetti >>>> >> > Founder and Chief Software Architect >>>> >> > Omnytex Technologies >>>> >> > http://www.omnytex.com >>>> >> > AIM/Yahoo: fzammetti >>>> >> > MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >> > Author of "Practical Ajax Projects With Java Technology" >>>> >> > (2006, Apress, ISBN 1-59059-695-1) >>>> >> > Java Web Parts - http://javawebparts.sourceforge.net >>>> >> > Supplying the wheel, so you don't have to reinvent it! >>>> >> > >>>> >> > On Fri, September 22, 2006 2:40 pm, Chris Pratt wrote: >>>> >> >> In your no-arg constructor of your outer ActionForm (the >>>> container), >>>> >> >> make >>>> >> >> sure it instantiates each of the nested ActionForms using their >>>> >> no-arg >>>> >> >> constructors. >>>> >> >> (*Chris*) >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> On 9/22/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> Sorry, by af1 and af2 I did mean actionForm1 and actionForm2... >>>> my >>>> >> >>> mistake >>>> >> >>> wasn't quite *THAT* obvious! ;) LOL >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> Frank >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> -- >>>> >> >>> Frank W. Zammetti >>>> >> >>> Founder and Chief Software Architect >>>> >> >>> Omnytex Technologies >>>> >> >>> http://www.omnytex.com >>>> >> >>> AIM/Yahoo: fzammetti >>>> >> >>> MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >> >>> Author of "Practical Ajax Projects With Java Technology" >>>> >> >>> (2006, Apress, ISBN 1-59059-695-1) >>>> >> >>> Java Web Parts - http://javawebparts.sourceforge.net >>>> >> >>> Supplying the wheel, so you don't have to reinvent it! >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> On Fri, September 22, 2006 1:31 pm, Frank W. Zammetti wrote: >>>> >> >>> > Hi Hubert, >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > Yes, I get nulls for af1 and af2... I do have getters and >>>> setters >>>> >> for >>>> >> >>> > them. >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > Lemme throw some data your way... I was hoping to avoid >>>> posting >>>> >> all >>>> >> >>> this, >>>> >> >>> > but I suspect there to be something my eyes just aren't >>>> catching, >>>> >> >>> so... >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > Here's ActionForm1: >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > package app.test.formbeans; >>>> >> >>> > import org.apache.struts.action.ActionForm; >>>> >> >>> > public class Action1Form extends ActionForm { >>>> >> >>> > private String field1; >>>> >> >>> > public void setField1(String inField1) { >>>> >> >>> > this.field1 = inField1; >>>> >> >>> > } >>>> >> >>> > public String getField1() { >>>> >> >>> > return this.field1; >>>> >> >>> > } >>>> >> >>> > } >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > ActionForm2 is identical, just replacing the number 1 with 2 >>>> >> >>> everywhere. >>>> >> >>> > Here's MasterForm: >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > package app.test.formbeans; >>>> >> >>> > import org.apache.struts.action.ActionForm; >>>> >> >>> > public class MasterForm extends ActionForm { >>>> >> >>> > public Action1Form action1Form; >>>> >> >>> > public Action2Form action2Form; >>>> >> >>> > public void setAction1Form(Action1Form inAction1Form) { >>>> >> >>> > this.action1Form = inAction1Form; >>>> >> >>> > } >>>> >> >>> > public Action1Form getAction1Form() { >>>> >> >>> > return this.action1Form; >>>> >> >>> > } >>>> >> >>> > public void setAction2Form(Action2Form inAction2Form) { >>>> >> >>> > this.action2Form = inAction2Form; >>>> >> >>> > } >>>> >> >>> > public Action2Form getAction2Form() { >>>> >> >>> > return this.action2Form; >>>> >> >>> > } >>>> >> >>> > } >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > The Action everything gets submitted to is just a >>>> ForwardAction, >>>> >> >>> which >>>> >> >>> > forwards to: >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > <%@ page language="java" import="app.test.formbeans.*" %> >>>> >> >>> > <% >>>> >> >>> > MasterForm masterForm = >>>> >> >>> (MasterForm)request.getAttribute("masterForm"); >>>> >> >>> > %> >>>> >> >>> > <%="masterForm = " + masterForm + "<br>"%> >>>> >> >>> > <% >>>> >> >>> > Tab1Form tab1Form = null; >>>> >> >>> > Tab2Form tab2Form = null; >>>> >> >>> > if (masterForm != null) { >>>> >> >>> > tab1Form = masterForm.getTab1Form(); >>>> >> >>> > tab2Form = masterForm.getTab2Form(); >>>> >> >>> > } >>>> >> >>> > %> >>>> >> >>> > <%="tab1Form = " + tab1Form + "<br>"%> >>>> >> >>> > <%="tab2Form = " + tab2Form + "<br>"%> >>>> >> >>> > <% if (tab1Form != null) { %> >>>> >> >>> > <%="field1 = " + tab1Form.getField1() + "<br>"%> >>>> >> >>> > <% } %> >>>> >> >>> > <% if (tab2Form != null) { %> >>>> >> >>> > <%="field2 = " + tab2Form.getField2() + "<br>"%> >>>> >> >>> > <% } %> >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > The result I see from this is: >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > masterForm = [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >> >>> > tab1Form = null >>>> >> >>> > tab2Form = null >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > The page that does that submit, in its final rendered form on >>>> the >>>> >> >>> client >>>> >> >>> > is: >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > <html> >>>> >> >>> > <head> >>>> >> >>> > <script> >>>> >> >>> > var finalSubmit = null; >>>> >> >>> > function getXHR() { >>>> >> >>> > if (window.XMLHttpRequest) { >>>> >> >>> > return new XMLHttpRequest(); >>>> >> >>> > } else if (window.ActiveXObject) { >>>> >> >>> > return new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP"); >>>> >> >>> > } >>>> >> >>> > } >>>> >> >>> > function submitAll() { >>>> >> >>> > var tab1Form = dojo.io.encodeForm( >>>> >> >>> > document.getElementById("tab1Form")); >>>> >> >>> > var tab2Form = dojo.io.encodeForm( >>>> >> >>> > document.getElementById("tab2Form")); >>>> >> >>> > finalSubmit = getXHR(); >>>> >> >>> > finalSubmit.onreadystatechange = finalSubmitCallback; >>>> >> >>> > finalSubmit.open("POST", "final.do", true); >>>> >> >>> > finalSubmit.send(tab1Form + tab2Form); >>>> >> >>> > } >>>> >> >>> > function finalSubmitCallback() { >>>> >> >>> > if (finalSubmit.readyState == 4) { >>>> >> >>> > document.getElementById("divResult").innerHTML = >>>> >> >>> > finalSubmit.responseText; >>>> >> >>> > } >>>> >> >>> > } >>>> >> >>> > </script> >>>> >> >>> > </head> >>>> >> >>> > <body onload="init();"> >>>> >> >>> > <form name="masterForm" id="tab1Form" method="post" >>>> >> >>> > action="/test/tab1.do"> >>>> >> >>> > Field1: <input name="tab1Form.field1" value="val1" >>>> >> >>> type="text"><br> >>>> >> >>> > </form> >>>> >> >>> > <br> >>>> >> >>> > <form name="masterForm" id="tab2Form" method="post" >>>> >> >>> > action="/test/tab2.do"> >>>> >> >>> > Field2: <input name="tab2Form.field2" value="val2" >>>> >> >>> type="text"><br> >>>> >> >>> > </form> >>>> >> >>> > <br> >>>> >> >>> > <input value="Submit All" onclick="submitAll();" >>>> type="button"> >>>> >> >>> > <br><br> >>>> >> >>> > <div id="divResult"></div> >>>> >> >>> > </body> >>>> >> >>> > </html> >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > Note that I removed all the Dojo-related stuff, and some >>>> stuff >>>> >> that >>>> >> >>> isn't >>>> >> >>> > related to this submissino, just to try and keep it small, >>>> but, >>>> >> the >>>> >> >>> > important thing to note is that when the submission is made, >>>> the >>>> >> >>> request >>>> >> >>> > that goes across is a POST to >>>> http://localhost:8080/test/final.do, >>>> >> as >>>> >> >>> > expected, and the POST body is: >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > tab1Form.field1=val1&tab2Form.field2=val2& >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > ...also as expected, verified in Firebug. Lastly, here's >>>> >> >>> struts-config: >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?> >>>> >> >>> > <!DOCTYPE struts-config PUBLIC "-//Apache Software >>>> Foundation//DTD >>>> >> >>> Struts >>>> >> >>> > Configuration 1.2//EN" >>>> >> >>> > "http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/dtds/struts-config_1_2.dtd";> >>>> >> >>> > <struts-config> >>>> >> >>> > <form-beans> >>>> >> >>> > <form-bean name="masterForm" >>>> >> type="app.test.formbeans.MasterForm" >>>> >> >>> /> >>>> >> >>> > </form-beans> >>>> >> >>> > <action-mappings> >>>> >> >>> > <action path="/final" type="app.test.actions.FinalAction" >>>> >> >>> > name="masterForm" scope="request" validate="false"> >>>> >> >>> > <forward name="defaultForward" path="/final.jsp" /> >>>> >> >>> > </action> >>>> >> >>> > </action-mappings> >>>> >> >>> > </struts-config> >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > Note here that I removed the stuff that generated the markup >>>> from >>>> >> >>> above >>>> >> >>> > too, since that seems to be working just fine, I'm pretty >>>> sure >>>> >> this >>>> >> >>> is >>>> >> >>> all >>>> >> >>> > that would be relevant. >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > So, seeing any obvious blunders on my part? Thanks Hubert! >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > Frank >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > -- >>>> >> >>> > Frank W. Zammetti >>>> >> >>> > Founder and Chief Software Architect >>>> >> >>> > Omnytex Technologies >>>> >> >>> > http://www.omnytex.com >>>> >> >>> > AIM/Yahoo: fzammetti >>>> >> >>> > MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >> >>> > Author of "Practical Ajax Projects With Java Technology" >>>> >> >>> > (2006, Apress, ISBN 1-59059-695-1) >>>> >> >>> > Java Web Parts - http://javawebparts.sourceforge.net >>>> >> >>> > Supplying the wheel, so you don't have to reinvent it! >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > On Fri, September 22, 2006 1:10 pm, Hubert Rabago wrote: >>>> >> >>> >> So what does happen when you submit the form? Are you >>>> getting >>>> >> NPEs? >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> By the time Struts attempts to populate the form bean, the >>>> nested >>>> >> >>> >> forms should already be instantiated. You should have >>>> getters >>>> >> and >>>> >> >>> >> setters for af1 and af2, and getAf1() and getAf2() should >>>> not >>>> >> return >>>> >> >>> a >>>> >> >>> >> null. This could be an issue if the form bean is new, >>>> either >>>> >> >>> because >>>> >> >>> >> it's in request scope, or in session scope but was not >>>> previously >>>> >> >>> >> instantiated. >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> Hubert >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> On 9/22/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >> >>> >>> I'm facing a situation where ideally I'd like to have a >>>> single >>>> >> >>> >>> ActionForm >>>> >> >>> >>> like so: >>>> >> >>> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>> public class MyActionForm extends ActionForm { >>>> >> >>> >>> AnotherActionForm1 af1; >>>> >> >>> >>> AnotherActionForm2 af2; >>>> >> >>> >>> } >>>> >> >>> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>> When in my JSP I do: >>>> >> >>> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>> <html:text property="af1.field1" /> >>>> >> >>> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>> ...I do indeed see the value as I expect. The way I did >>>> this >>>> is >>>> >> to >>>> >> >>> >>> have >>>> >> >>> >>> an Action mapping that references MyActionForm, then within >>>> the >>>> >> >>> Action >>>> >> >>> >>> I >>>> >> >>> >>> instantiate AnotherActionForm1, set the value of field1 on >>>> it, >>>> >> and >>>> >> >>> then >>>> >> >>> >>> set af1 to that new AnotherActionForm1 instance. That all >>>> works >>>> >> >>> >>> nicely. >>>> >> >>> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>> Here's where I run into a problem... >>>> >> >>> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>> On the page I basically have 2 separate HTML forms, one for >>>> >> >>> >>> AnotherActionForm1 and another for AnotherActionForm2. >>>> However, >>>> >> I >>>> >> >>> have >>>> >> >>> >>> a >>>> >> >>> >>> SINGLE submit button at the end (just plain button that >>>> makes >>>> an >>>> >> >>> AJAX >>>> >> >>> >>> request). onClick of that button, I create a query string >>>> from >>>> >> the >>>> >> >>> >>> values >>>> >> >>> >>> of both forms, and make a request to the server with the >>>> query >>>> >> >>> string >>>> >> >>> >>> attached. The parameter names of the query string >>>> arguments >>>> are >>>> >> >>> >>> af1.field1 and af2.field2, mimicing what's in MyActionForm. >>>> The >>>> >> >>> >>> mapping >>>> >> >>> >>> that the request goes to again references MyActionForm. >>>> >> >>> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>> What I've been told should happen is that Struts should be >>>> able >>>> >> to >>>> >> >>> >>> instantiate those two nested beans and set the properties, >>>> since >>>> >> >>> the >>>> >> >>> >>> parameter names give it the information it needs. This >>>> does >>>> not >>>> >> >>> >>> however >>>> >> >>> >>> seem to be happening. >>>> >> >>> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>> So, two questions... first, is that in fact the expected >>>> >> >>> behavoir? And >>>> >> >>> >>> two, if so, any ideas what I'm doing wrong? I can post all >>>> the >>>> >> >>> >>> pertinent >>>> >> >>> >>> config and code, but thought it might be something more >>>> generic >>>> >> >>> that >>>> >> >>> >>> wouldn't require all that. This is the first time I've >>>> ever >>>> had >>>> >> a >>>> >> >>> need >>>> >> >>> >>> to >>>> >> >>> >>> nest forms like this, so it's a new question for me. >>>> >> >>> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>> Thanks all! >>>> >> >>> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>> Frank >>>> >> >>> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>> -- >>>> >> >>> >>> Frank W. Zammetti >>>> >> >>> >>> Founder and Chief Software Architect >>>> >> >>> >>> Omnytex Technologies >>>> >> >>> >>> http://www.omnytex.com >>>> >> >>> >>> AIM/Yahoo: fzammetti >>>> >> >>> >>> MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >> >>> >>> Author of "Practical Ajax Projects With Java Technology" >>>> >> >>> >>> (2006, Apress, ISBN 1-59059-695-1) >>>> >> >>> >>> Java Web Parts - http://javawebparts.sourceforge.net >>>> >> >>> >>> Supplying the wheel, so you don't have to reinvent it! >>>> >> >>> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >> >>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >> >>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >> >>> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >> >>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >> >>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >> >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >> >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> > >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
