Sure, it should look better, but it still wouldn't split out optional and required dependencies. For example, it shows Rife Continuations as required but it is very much optional.
Don On 11/10/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/10/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm...that list is very deceptive as it doesn't break down which > dependencies are optional and which are required. Only a couple are > actually required, while the rest are either fully optional or only > required if a certain plugin is used. Any way we could clean that up? Haven't a lot of the optional dependencies moved out to plugins? The page was last published on 10/8. I'd re-publish it and see if it looks better now. -- Wendy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
