Another important difference between ActionMessages and ActionErrors
has to do with how the Validation interceptor works.
If you add an ActionError in the 'validate' method (or before the
ValidationInterceptor get ahold of the request) of a ValidationAware
action, the interceptor will see that there is some kind of error,
and consequently, not fire the intended action method (execute by
default). ActionMessages do not act that way. You can add
ActionMessages without having an affect on the workflow of the action.
Eric Rank
On Apr 24, 2007, at 12:49 PM, Harring Figueiredo wrote:
I was supposed to test the genereated HTML from both. (Laziness got
the best
of me).
<guess>
Here it goes, without testing. I think that the HTML generated is
slightly
different so that you
may apply different CSS style sheets to it.
</guess>
harringf
On 4/24/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<redundant>actionMessages is for general messages, and
actionErrors for
errors.</redundant> . I don't think there are any implications.
regards
musachy
On 4/24/07, Zoran Avtarovski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A quick question on what the recommended method for displaying
general
> messages when using struts 2, actionMessages or actionErrors.
>
> I had a look at the ValidationAware interface and there appears
to be no
> difference between the two.
>
> The only difference I could see what that they are accessed by
different
> tags.
>
> Which one is recommended? My main concern is are the non-obvious
> implications of choosing one over another.
>
> Z.
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
