In option 2, OGNL expressions are not supported. We will update the documentation before 2.1 is released (everything ajax-related will be better documented).
musachy On 5/9/07, אלחנן מעין <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
what are the limitations on using option 2? will there be documenation, describing how to use 3 and 4? >From: "Musachy Barroso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <user@struts.apache.org> >To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <user@struts.apache.org> >Subject: Re: is ajax validation broken? >Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 17:18:44 -0400 > >There are different ways of performing validation (3 and 4 on 2.1 only): > >1. normal: validation occurs on the server and page is returned with errors >(can use OGNL) >2. javascript: validation occurs on the client using javascript (limited) >3. ajax : validation occurs on the server, if there are errors a json >string >with the errors is returned so they can be shown on the user interface (can >use OGNL) (developer can decide if contol will be transfered to a new page >or not, when validation succeeds) >4. ajax + javascript: same as 3, but javascript validation runs before >making the ajax request (developer can decide if contol will be transfered >to a new page or not, when validation succeeds) > >I hope that helps >musachy > >On 5/8/07, אלחנן מעין <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>i would seem a lot ajax related fixing stuff are being loaded on 2.1.0 >>version.. seems nice i can finally find something comparable to >>commons-validations. (or asp.net validators). >>what's the difference in the show case between "Field Validators with >>client-side JavaScript " >>it's messages seemd to appear at the same location as samples in >>"Validation (client) " >> >>today a developer that ajax is one of biggest mistakes ever made, that >>after >>the world has spent years of getting off client/server architechture, it >>getting back into a client/server like ui. >> >> >> >From: "Musachy Barroso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <user@struts.apache.org> >> >To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <user@struts.apache.org> >> >Subject: Re: is ajax validation broken? >> >Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 12:43:09 -0400 >> > >> >on 2.0.6? yes. The ajax validation won't help you much if you are not >>using >> >complex OGNL expressions for validation (or code). >> > >> >musachy >> > >> >On 5/8/07, אלחנן מעין <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >>so i should just use client side validation then? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >From: "Musachy Barroso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <user@struts.apache.org> >> >> >To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <user@struts.apache.org> >> >> >Subject: Re: is ajax validation broken? >> >> >Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 08:48:20 -0400 >> >> > >> >> >Ajax validation has been changed/fixed for 2.1, where DWR is not >> >>required >> >> >any more. In 2.1 you will be able to just add an interceptor to your >> >>class >> >> >to enable ajax validation for it(and use the dojo plugin). The jira >> >>ticket: >> >> > >> >> >https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1897 >> >> > >> >> >musachy >> >> > >> >> >On 5/8/07, אלחנן מעין <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>i've looked at the struts showcase samples, and where it says >> >>validation >> >> >>(ajax) it says broken, i running it, and it looks fine i think, >>(still >> >> >>don't >> >> >>know how to make it work on my application though , i clicked submit >> >>and >> >> >>moved away and it doesn't do anything. >> >> >> >> >> >>_________________________________________________________________ >> >> >>Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! >> >> >>http://search.msn.com/ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >-- >> >> >"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd >> >> >> >>_________________________________________________________________ >> >>FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar - get it now! >> >>http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/ >> >> >> >> >> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >-- >> >"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd >> >>_________________________________________________________________ >>Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! >>http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ >> >> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > >-- >"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
