The funny thing is that I've spend the past few months working with
RoR. I like it, but I finally have some time to investigate the Java
world. I have this nagging concern about RoR performance.
One thing I hope to learn soon is, once over the pain of initial
configuration with Java based frameworks, how hard is it to add another
class, view, etc.
String Larson wrote:
That's what we're using as well.
Plus using EJB3/Annotations (over Hibernate3) for persistence.
Works well. No show stoppers thus far.
If don't expect your web app to be too complex, I'd recommend a hard
look at Ruby on Rails.
The whole S2, Spring, Hibernate thing is very powerful. However, it is
getting too
bulky w/configuration and dependencies for less complex projects.
On May 11, 2007, at 4:29 PM, Josh Vickery wrote:
Spring has several components, but the one I use (and the one I think
is the most popular) is the Inversion of Control (IOC) framework.
Struts 2 (when it was Web Work) had some IOC support, but it wasn't as
full featured as what Spring offers.
Spring also has an MVC, which is a direct competitor to Struts 2. I
personally don't like Spring MVC, and would much rather use Struts 2.
Josh
On 5/11/07, Rick Schumeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Let me ask you a question that I've never really received a good answer
to. Keep in mind that my knowledge of Java web programming is some S1,
and just starting with S2. I have never really looked at Spring.
I understand that S2 and Spring somehow work together. What I don't
understand is: why would I want to use both of them? If Spring is so
great, why don't I just buy a copy of Spring in Action and forget about
S2?
I guess I'm looking for answer to: what problem does Spring solve that
S2 does not? And vice-versa.
Musachy Barroso wrote:
> Have you tried using Spring?. It plays nicely with Struts and
hibernate,
> plus there are some examples around I think.
>
> musachy
>
> On 5/11/07, Rick Schumeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Now I'm trying to configure Hibernate with S2, which many others
have
>> done. I was trying to follow the example in WebWork in Action, but
>> things have obviously changed since then.
>>
>> To be clear, the problem is to create a SessionFactory once in
such a
>> way that all my actions can easily have access to it. The
approach in
>> WWiA uses IoC. As far as I know, it would work in S2 but would need
>> many modifications because package names have changed. And perhaps
>> other mods would be needed?
>>
>> I'm not sure if the best approach is:
>>
>> a) Use the strategy in WWiA, but change the import statements to
match
>> the current jars (and perhaps make other changes to match S2)
>>
>> or
>>
>> b) Something else.
>>
>> Perhaps someone could point me to a complete solution?
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
