BUT GURU WHEN I CLOSE THE IE SESSEIONDESTROYED METHOD IS NOT EXECUTING IS THERE ANY CONFIGURATION PARAMETERS I HAVE TO SET IN WEB.XML OR STRUTS-CONFIG.XML
-----Original Message----- From: Dave Newton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 4:45 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [S2] decoding values of objects properties I'm still not entirely what you're decoding from and to; it sounds like something is fundamentally broken, but... Remember that with OGNL you *can* call arbitrary methods, including static utility methods, from with the EL. So with either a static decoding class or (preferably) a service object in your action if you're iterating over a list you can call methods on items from that list. d. --- Paolo Beccari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- Dave Newton wrote: > > > > Why? > > > > I'll try to explain. The main problem is, that i > would not to expose a > single getter-method in the action for each property > I want to decode. I'm > searching for a more generic method. > I thought on some possibile solution, one was to > return, in each action, the > entire decode set (roughly speaking, a series of > tuples name-value-decode). > That way, I could handle it with <s:iterator and > <s:if tag each time I need > a decode. In addition, if the decoded value I'm > searching is the last in the > list, the list is entirely scrolled before finding > result. So I tend to > discard that. > > Maybe it is only a matter of wrong architectural > design: we are returning to > the views some objects mapped from the database > layer "as they are". It is > possible we need an additional level between, to > provide decoded values for > each property, but the temptation to use a scriplet > <%=Decode(name, value)%> > with a generic, singleton Decoder class is still > strong :). > > > > > I've never had to do that, but if I did, I'd be > most > > likely to do it in the action or, more likely, a > > service object in the action. > > > > d. > > > > Yes, I'd be most likely to do, too. But I have to > find a way to NOT write > hundreds of methods, one for each decode-set. > Well, I'll continue thinking on it, BTW thanks for > reply. > > P. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ________________________________________________________________________ ____________ Get the free Yahoo! toolbar and rest assured with the added security of spyware protection. http://new.toolbar.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/norton/index.php --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DISCLAIMER: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. It shall not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of HCL or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any mail and attachments please check them for viruses and defect. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
