No worries, It's useful to bring issues like this up so that people can
search the mailing list archives and get the solution if the hit the same
problem. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Ray Clough [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 14 June 2007 17:17
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: Struts 2.0.8 upgrade question

Sorry for the unjustified criticism.  It is going to be difficult for people
to get the correct jar, as it is not a link on the Tiles site.  I had to
guess that the 2.0.3 download url was a mod of the 2.0.4 url, and
fortunately, it was.
- rc

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Al Sutton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <user@struts.apache.org>
> Subject: RE: Struts 2.0.8 upgrade question
> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 07:34:00 +0100
> 
> 
> Ray,
> 
> The tiles-jsp jar was an addition between the tiles release in S2.0.6 
> and Tile 2.0.3, the packaging script therefore didn't include it and I 
> only raised it after I was testing 2.0.8 when the call for a vote on 
> 2.0.8 had already gone out. It's been fixed for future releases, but 
> by the time I raised the issue 2.0.8 was already packaged and ready to 
> roll. I'm pretty sure the tests for Struts don't include any tiles jsp 
> tests because, after all, tiles is tested by the tiles group, and we 
> don't want to have the nightmare of developing tests for every library
included in S2.
> 
> Then there was a bit of bad luck was that the 2.0.4 release was made 
> the day after the 2.0.8 release was rolled, hence why 2.0.8 has Tiles
2.0.3 bundled.
> 
> Hope this helps you understand why what happened was a little less 
> than insanity and more some unfortunate circumstances:).
> 
> Al.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ray Clough [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 13 June 2007 22:09
> To: user@struts.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Struts 2.0.8 upgrade question
> 
> 
> I got it to work with 2 steps.  1)  I downloaded the 2.0.3 version of
Tiles.
> 
> Note that this requires knowing the download url, because the current 
> Tiles download page is for v2.0.4 only.  The difference in the 
> download url is only the version number.  2)  The Tiles DTD seems to 
> have changed.  The 'put' tag is now 'put-attribute'.  Of course, that 
> is a Tiles issue, not a Struts issue.
> 
> As a commentary, omitting an important and required dependency from a 
> well-understood sister-project seems to argue some sort of insanity in 
> the
> Struts-2 release process.  (you say that you had previously raised the 
> issue, yet they still failed to include it.)
> 
> - Ray Clough
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Al Sutton-4 wrote:
> >
> > Grab the distribution from tiles.apache.org and copy the jsp jar 
> > into your webapp.
> >
> > This is something I raised on the dev list and the jar will be part 
> > of future builds.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: "Ray Clough" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: user@struts.apache.org
> > Sent: 6/13/07 9:00 PM
> > Subject: Re: Struts 2.0.8 upgrade question
> >
> >
> > Nope.  It seems pretty clear that something is missing.  Here is the
> > error:
> >
> > java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
> > org.apache.tiles.jsp.context.JspTilesContextFactory
> >
> > For Tiles 2.0.4, that file is found in the file 
> > "tiles-jsp-2.0.4.jar.  I don't know about Tiles 2.0.3 that is 
> > bundled with Struts-2.0.8, but 2.0.8 does not include a 
> > 'tiles-jsp-2.0.3.jar' file.
> >
> > - Ray Clough
> >
> >
> >
> > Al Sutton-4 wrote:
> >>
> >> Have you checked the old version of tiles has been removed?, the 
> >> version shipped with 2.0.6 was a pre-release of Tiles 2 and the 
> >> internal APIs changed, I had some problems until I realised my 
> >> appserver was caching the old tiles jars and the problems were 
> >> comming
> from an API mismatch.
> >>
> >> Ray Clough wrote:
> >>> It doesn't seem to be a straight forward upgrade from 2.0.6, at 
> >>> least so far as Tiles is concerned.  We get a bunch of different 
> >>> exceptions, depending on what we try to do.  Each fix seems to 
> >>> break something else, though.
> >>>
> >>> Advice?
> >>>
> >>> - Ray Clough
> >>
> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> > http://www.nabble.com/Struts-2.0.8-upgrade-question-tf3917170.html#a
> > 11
> > 107695 Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> 
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Struts-2.0.8-upgrade-question-tf3917170.html#a11
> 109011 Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

>



- Ray Clough
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to