<!-- Actions -->
   <bean id="pufAction" class="actions.PayrollUpdateAction"
scope="prototype" >
       <property name="payrollUpdate" ref="anUpdate"/>
   </bean>



       <!-- Add actions here -->
       <action name="PayrollUpdate_*" method="{1}" class="pufAction">
           <result name="input">PayrollUpdate</result>
           <result name="list">PayrollUpdate_list</result>
           <result name="add">PayrollUpdate</result>
           <result name="show">PayrollUpdate</result>
           <result name="edit">PayrollUpdate</result>
           <result name="destroy">PayrollUpdate</result>
           <result name="notes"
type="chain">PayrollUpdateNotes_list</result>
       </action>

On 6/20/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

That should be it, and scope=prototype  has always done the trick for me,
why don't you post relevant parts of the spring conf file?

regards
musachy

On 6/20/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Oooop!  The struts.xml change did not force the context to reload!  Now
> that
> I have changed the class in the action mapping to the fully qualified
> class
> name, it *is* being instantiated on each request!  So why is it not
> working
> with the Spring bean id?
>
> On 6/20/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I replaced the spring bean id in my action mapping with the fully
> > qualified class name to rule Spring out completely.  I am still never
> seeing
> > the log4j output in the constructor of my action class!  I have double
> > checked my log4j.properties and the debug output would be written out
if
> > the constructor were called.
> >
> > Any ideas?  Could this have anything to do with an interceptor?
> >
> > On 6/20/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm using Spring 2.x and the attribute scope="prototype"
> > >
> > > On 6/19/07, Zarar Siddiqi < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > It sounds to me like your Action class might be configured as a
> > > > singleton.
> > > > If that's the case the action class' constructor would only be
> called
> > > > once
> > > > on startup.  Make sure you have singleton="false" in your Spring
> > > > config for
> > > > the action class.  The default value for singleton is true.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > stanlick wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > It appears as though I am not getting a new Action instance
> created
> > > > for
> > > > > each
> > > > > request!  I have placed a logging statement in the constructor
of
> my
> > > > > Action
> > > > > class and it is not emitting output.  The Bean inside the Action
> > > > *is*
> > > > > emitting log statements from its constructor so I must have the
> > > > Spring
> > > > > beans
> > > > > wired correctly.  I am injecting both the Actions and Action
Beans
> > > > via
> > > > > Spring.  I have scope=prototype on them both.
> > > > >
> > > > > Any ideas?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Scott
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > View this message in context:
> > > >
>
http://www.nabble.com/Spring-Action-Instantiation-tf3948840.html#a11205652
> > > > Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Scott
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Scott
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
> --
> Scott
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>



--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd




--
Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to