--- Big Stick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I always thought a stack implied levels! Am I > strange to think maybe the stack search should > consider this capability?
I think you and Musachy have the right idea with an #action (or whatever; I'd actually go for something quicker to type) rather than a stack search; technically it could be arbitrarily deep, and that makes me nervous. But I'm naturally jittery. (I actually thought there already *was* an #action doohickey on the stack but it turns out that was something I had experimented with quite some time ago; it was pretty useful--but it almost made me screw up the answer to your ModelDriven question of a week or few ago.) d. ____________________________________________________________________________________ We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love (and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list. http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
