At the moment we are using URLRewrite to bypass all the trouble with S2 intercepting static content (we are also not using any action extension). But it would be even better if the filter was patched :)
Ted Husted wrote: > > It's possible that the use case of a an empty action extension was not > considered when the filter was first designed. It does seem like a > valid use case, and it may be time to patch the filter. > > -Ted. > > On 7/26/07, matihost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I wondering why filter dispatcher do not check existence of mapping >> returned from ActionMapper and if it doesn't exist, behave as when >> ActionMapper is null. Probably it is faster for not empty >> "struts.action.extension" actions. >> >> I found also solution to use /someName/* for struts filter dispatcher >> mapping, but i don`t want to use it. >> >> -- >> Greetings >> Mateusz Nowakowski > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/S2-%2B-REST-urls-tf4152090.html#a11862390 Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
