--- Guillaume Bilodeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes it was deliberate. I'm not sure I see the > advantages of flattening my action *and* my request > object, for now I'd rather keep this nested as it > currently is. Of course I'll change my mind if > given the right counter-arguments :)
The most compelling counter-argument is that getModel() doesn't expose anything to the JSP unless you implement ModelDriven. You reference "food.name" etc. on your form but don't expose anything named "food", which is what Adam was referring to. Even if you *did* implement ModelDriven you would still not be exposing anything named "food" to the JSP: the result of the getModel() call is pushed on to the stack, properties are accessed by name (without the bean name), like <s:property value="name"/>. d. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
