From: specdev2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I have to disagree with you on customizing the interceptors. > It is just sloppy to use a generic stack that calls every interceptor.
I guess I'm just "sloppy" then. I have a general-purpose interceptor stack that works quite well; I have *very* few actions that don't need every interceptor in it. I have more important things to do than obsess over interceptor stack definitions for a hundred (or whatever) actions, particularly when most would only differ by at most one or two interceptors. > Important issues also get lost when you do that. Apparently important issues also get lost when you don't. > I really wish there was a way to group actions for the purpose > of applying default stacks without being forced to define a > namespace or overriding the default stack of an existing namespace. If you want your own default stack then overriding the default stack seems pretty natural to me. Dave --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
