and if i will add the namespace to the struts.xml
it is giving the error message as
"

*No configuration found for the specified action: 'TestExample' in
namespace: ''. Form action defaulting to 'action' attribute's literal value.
*
any idea about these warnings..


On 3/6/08, aum strut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ther is one more thing as i am using myeclipse for the development and
> when i am running the application it is giving the warning as"
>
> *"No configuration found for the specified action: 'TestExample' in
> namespace: ''. Form action defaulting to 'action' attribute's literal value"
> *
> "
>
> On 3/6/08, Othon Reyes Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > * my index.jsp page is displaying properly whcih is asking for the
> > inputs
> > but when i click the submitt button it is giving me the error as
> > *"The requested resource (/StrutsStarter/TestExample) is not
> > availableE"**
> >
> > It is interesting why you have */StrutsStarter/TestExample *instead of *
> > /StrutsStarter/TestExample.action*
> > What hapen if you put the url directly in your browser?.
> > As you can see i'm just guessing but that's what i will do to start
> > solving
> > this problem :P.
> >
> > What happen if you change
> > <s:form action="TestExample">
> > For
> > <s:form action="TestExample.action">
> >
> > I know is not necessary but maybe it could work.
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 10:58 AM, aum strut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Dave and Othon,
> > >
> > > even on adding "namespace" and even removing the annotation based
> > > validations from the action
> > > i am still facing the same problem.
> > >
> > >
> > > On 3/6/08, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- Othon Reyes Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > I guess somebody else have a very similar problem
> > > > >
> > > > > Change:
> > > > > <package name="aum.struts.tester" extends="struts-default">
> > > > > For:
> > > > > <package name="aum.struts.tester" extends="struts-default"
> > > > namespace="/">
> > > >
> > > > The other problem was occurring specifically because of the attempt
> > to
> > > use
> > > > zero-config alongside XML config in the same package, which
> > apparently
> > > > doesn't work. While I'd probably encourage setting the namespace
> > > > explicitly,
> > > > it isn't required under most circumstances.
> > > >
> > > > Dave
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to