On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Pierre Thibaudeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/6/26 Chris Pratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> How does your case differ from the example on the Type Conversion page >> you referenced? It seems to me you're trying to do exactly what that >> page says you can't? >> > > My understanding of > http://struts.apache.org/2.1.2/docs/type-conversion.html#TypeConversion-GenericsandErasure > is that Struts cannot *infer* the actual type of a generified type. (And > that was the very first statement I made at the beginning of this thread.) > Which is exactly why I intend to *specify* the conversion (and not let > Struts attempt to do something which it can't do). > > It's obvious from the erasure of generics that Struts could not (even in > theory) deduce the correct conversion. But if I specify my own converter, > why does it fail to make use of it? I don't see that the reference I quoted > makes any comment about that... >
Ahhh, that's the piece I missed. Seems like that should work, but I haven't had to try anything like that. Sorry. (*Chris*) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
