I already told you I don't know and you continue to refuse to provide the
information I've asked for. You also added new information about Acegi, which I
responded to by saying that yes, if you're getting logged out it's unlikely
you'd keep the same session, as that would somewhat defeat the purpose of any
reasonable login/logout mechanism.
I don't think I have anything further of value to offer you. I don't know of
any issues with session variables; if you're having an Acegi issue then pursue
the issue on a Spring forum.
Dave
Milan Milanovic wrote:
> Dear Dave,
> O.K. But when you look at this scenario:
> MyFirstActionClass -> show first.jsp -> user click on link ->
> MyFirstActionClass.method where I set session variable
> (getSession().put("variable", new Boolean(true)); -> show second.jsp (here I
> see my variable) -> user click on some link ->
> MySecondActionClass.method->third.jsp (here I don't see my variable).
> I should note that in MySecondActionClass.method I don't clear session or
> something similar, I just add remove some other variables and set some new.
> Why my session is obviously cleared when action from another namespace is
> called ?
> --
> Thx, Milan
> newton.dave wrote:
>>
>> I didn't say it wouldn't work. I, and the Sun documentation I quoted, said
>> it was a known bad programming practice.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>> Milan Milanovic wrote:
>>> Hi Dave,
>>> no, I think that this is not an issue. I tried with Boolean.TRUE and it
>>> is
>>> the same, but I earlier used new Boolean(true) and that worked.
>>> --
>>> Milan
>>> newton.dave wrote:
>>>>
>>>> --- On Thu, 7/31/08, Milan Milanovic wrote:
>>>>> (getSession().put("variable", new Boolean(true));
>>>>
>>>> Use Boolean.TRUE rather than instantiating a new object.
>>>>
>>>> Note also that the Javadocs for Boolean state in big bold letters:
>>>>
>>>> "Note: It is rarely appropriate to use this constructor. Unless a new
>>>> instance is required, the static factory valueOf(boolean) is generally a
>>>> better choice. It is likely to yield significantly better space and time
>>>> performance."
>>>>
>>>> Dave
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://www.nabble.com/-S2--Testing-if-session-variable-is-present-tp18716278p18756698.html
>>> Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/-S2--Testing-if-session-variable-is-present-tp18716278p18758095.html
> Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
