Thanks bro! I generally agree with you, but was curious about the hard/fast rule. I discovered the dispatcher actually "processes" only registered extensions and unfortunately a zero length string was in the list alongside action. I changed my experimental resource mapping to .fred and all is well.
P.S. Where is that book dude? I have AMX in hand. Peace, Scott On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 7:31 PM, Wes Wannemacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Generally, I just map everything through the dispatcher. I find s2 > actions/results more friendly than straight up JSP and/or Servlets... > > Beyond that, if you're incorporating something that doesn't already have > a result type, would it be a good candidate for a plugin? > > -Wes > > On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 12:27 -0700, stanlick wrote: > > I am experimenting with a non-Struts resource mapped in my web.xml but > since > > the Struts filter is catching all requests, I am getting > > > > There is no Action mapped for namespace / and action name callout. - > > [unknown location] > > > > How do requests for non-action mappings sneak through the > FilterDispatcher? > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
