On Thursday 11 September 2008 21:37:58 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > What package/class contains your > > String name = invocation.getProxy().getConfig().getPackageName(); >
The call to String name = invocation.getProxy().getConfig().getPackageName(); is made by an interceptor which is defined in the "default" package. I've experimented further by adding a second empty package after the "empty" package in struts.xml (called "bug" extends "default") and now a call to any action in the "default" package is showing as being in "bug" If I reverse the declarations within struts.xml so I define in order packages "default- extends struts-default", "secure extends default", "bug extends default" & "empty extends default" I see actions in "default" showing in "empty" Any call to an action in "secure extends default" is still correctly identified as being in package " secure" unless I remove the "empty" and "bug" package definitions at which point all actions are shown as being in "secure" Regards > On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 5:46 AM, Roger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have a struts.xml with two package tags. The first package is named > > <package > > name="default" extends="struts-default"> and contains my custom > > interceptor stack. The second package is named <package name="secure" > > extends="default"> > > so that my custom interceptor stack is available to actions in the secure > > package. > > > > In my custom interceptor stack I have an interceptor in which I am trying > > to > > determine in which package the action being called is located. > > > > name = invocation.getProxy().getConfig().getClassName(); correctly > > identifies > > the class of the action being called, but > > > > String name = invocation.getProxy().getConfig().getPackageName(); returns > > the > > name "secure" for all actions regardless of the package the class is > > actually > > located in. If I now add a third package tag <package name="empty" > > extends="default"> that contains no actions at all, String name = > > invocation.getProxy().getConfig().getPackageName(); now returns the > > string "empty" for all actions in packages "default" and "secure"! > > > > Have I found a bug, or am I fundementally misunderstanding how packages > > work? > > I'm using version 2.0.11 > > > > Regards > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
