Yes something else was happening...me! I've mistakenly been written this method in some other subclass C of A (which was not the executing action.)
what a waste of time...sorry... 2008/9/17 Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > --- On Wed, 9/17/08, Gabriel Belingueres wrote: >> The surprising thing is it is NEVER called >> (which I believe OGNL can not resolve it) > > I don't see how that's possible; it would be called on whatever is on the > stack and normal inheritance mechanics would apply. > > I am also unable to reproduce the problem, so I suspect something else is > happening. Can you provide more info? > > Dave > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
