It is a solaris box and has 16 GB memory and 4 CPU it is high end server
class machine . Some how I suspect it is the OGNL or Freemarker rendering
issue .

Jim Kiley wrote:
> 
> What kind of server are you using here, how much memory, what CPU -- when
> we
> are getting to CPU utilization, all of these issues are relevant.
> 
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 3:43 PM, sajanv007 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>>
>> I have tried all the tuning parameters mentioned in the link somehow CPU
>> utilization is always 80% ,I observed that it takes tags are rendered
>> from
>> free marker cache but still the cpu 80-90% .
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Sajan
>>
>>
>> Nils-Helge Garli wrote:
>> >
>> > Maybe this can help:
>> > http://struts.apache.org/2.0.11.2/docs/performance-tuning.html
>> >
>> > Nils-H
>> >
>> > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 9:11 PM, sajanv007 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> There is huge performance issue and CPU hogging with Struts2 tag ,
>> this
>> >> was
>> >> observed while rendering JSP. These are some performance results
>> obtained
>> >>
>> >> Strut 2 Tag - With all performance tuning applied as per Struts 2
>> >> documentation - Freemarker caching etc...
>> >> Load Runner Tool
>> >> 40 users
>> >> 900 hits per second
>> >> 10 transaction per second
>> >>
>> >> Results
>> >> CPU utilization 90%
>> >> Response 3.5 sec
>> >>
>> >> Replaced some of Struts2 Tag , with Custom JSP Tags like (s:label,
>> >> s:text,s:textfield,s:hidden,s:param)
>> >> 40 users
>> >> 900 hits per second
>> >> 15 transaction per second
>> >>
>> >> Results
>> >> CPU utilization 70%
>> >> Response 2.0 sec
>> >>
>> >> Some where down the line Struts 2 tag are very cpu hungry , to people
>> to
>> >> adopt to strut2 framework cpu utilization should be optimized .
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Did anybody come across on how to over come this problem
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> View this message in context:
>> >>
>> http://www.nabble.com/Performance-and-High-CPU-utilization-tp19559123p19559123.html
>> >> Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Performance-and-High-CPU-utilization-tp19559123p19560223.html
>> Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jim Kiley
> Technical Consultant | Summa
> [p] 412.258.3346 [m] 412.445.1729
> http://www.summa-tech.com
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Performance-and-High-CPU-utilization-tp19559123p19560372.html
Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to