Hi,
I get the same error from 2.7.2 as 2.7.3.

Here is the jsp fragment that fails
<s:select
        name="searchJobVO.type"
        label="Typ av ärende:"
        required="false"
        headerKey="-1"
        headerValue="Alla"
        list="jobTypeList"
/>

And the error is: 

2008-10-03 15:55:32,280 ERROR- 
[localhost].[/serf-web].[default]:253,http-8080-Processor25 - Servlet.service() 
for servlet default threw exception
tag 'select', field 'list', name 'searchJobVO.type': The requested list key 
'jobTypeList' could not be resolved as a 
collection/array/map/enumeration/iterator type. Example: people or 
people.{name} - [unknown location]
        at 
org.apache.struts2.components.Component.fieldError(Component.java:231)
        at org.apache.struts2.components.Component.findValue(Component.java:293)
        at 
org.apache.struts2.components.ListUIBean.evaluateExtraParams(ListUIBean.java:79)
        at 
org.apache.struts2.components.Select.evaluateExtraParams(Select.java:99)
        at org.apache.struts2.components.UIBean.evaluateParams(UIBean.java:780)
        at org.apache.struts2.components.UIBean.end(UIBean.java:481)
        at 
org.apache.struts2.views.jsp.ComponentTagSupport.doEndTag(ComponentTagSupport.java:43)
        at 
org.apache.jsp.WEB_002dINF.jsp.ordermanagement.ongoingOrder.ongoingOrderSearch_jsp._jspx_meth_s_005fselect_005f4(ongoingOrderSearch_jsp.java:1024)
        at 
org.apache.jsp.WEB_002dINF.jsp.ordermanagement.ongoingOrder.ongoingOrderSearch_jsp._jspx_meth_s_005fform_005f0(ongoingOrderSearch_jsp.java:456)
        at 
org.apache.jsp.WEB_002dINF.jsp.ordermanagement.ongoingOrder.ongoingOrderSearch_jsp._jspService(ongoingOrderSearch_jsp.java:166)

In the same jsp page I have a few other drop down lists that still works with 
the new version of ognl!

Any ideas?

/Gunnar


> -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Skickat: den 3 oktober 2008 08:24
> Till: user@struts.apache.org
> Ämne: SV: Ognl versions
> 
> Ok, then I take version 2.7.2 for a spin.
> /Gunnar
>  
> 
> > -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> > Från: Chris Pratt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Skickat: den 2 oktober 2008 17:42
> > Till: Struts Users Mailing List
> > Ämne: Re: Ognl versions
> > 
> > I have been using OGNL 2.7.2 with Struts 2.0.11.2 and 2.1.2 for a 
> > while without any problems.  Maybe it's something in OGNL 
> 2.7.3 that 
> > is incompatible.
> >   (*Chris*)
> > 
> > On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 6:45 AM, Owen Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > wrote:
> > 
> > > In light of this issue, it would be nice if a newer 
> version of ognl 
> > > could be used within struts. I'm using the 2.1.2 beta and it also 
> > > depends on ognl-2.6.11. Not sure how simple it would be to
> > update to a
> > > newer ognl though as struts-2.1.2 also depends on
> > xwork-2.1.1, which
> > > depends on ognl-2.6.11, so it would need to be updated too.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 7:41 AM,
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > I can see that many of my threads stays blocked for a 
> long time in
> > > gnl.OgnlRuntime.invokeMethod line 511.
> > > > If this is to any help.
> > > > :-)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> > > >> Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > > >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >> Skickat: den 2 oktober 2008 12:11
> > > >> Till: user@struts.apache.org
> > > >> Ämne: Ognl versions
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >> We use struts2-core 2.0.11.2 which according to maven use 
> > > >> opensymphony.ognl version 2.6.11.
> > > >>
> > > >> I wonder what the relationships is to ognl.ognl and
> > specifically if
> > > >> the opensymphony version also has the bug
> > > >> http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/OGNL-141
> > > >>
> > > >> When we are doing load tests we get very long response times.
> > > >> I tried to replace opensymphony.ognl version 2.6.11 with
> > ognl.ognl
> > > >> version 2.7.3 but got functional errors.
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards
> > > >> Gunnar
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> 
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > 
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to