The action-per-jsp page is just one way to do things. Another is to use wildcard actions in your struts.xml page. Your input pages would all have to employ the same naming convention, as would the actions called by each of those pages. Check out the wildcard-mappings link and you'll see what I mean. http://struts.apache.org/2.0.11.2/docs/wildcard-mappings.html
-----Original Message----- From: 928572663 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 12:14 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [s2] Problem getting basic server side field validation to work Thanks David. So are you saying that the struts2 validation framework requires one Action per JSP page? If so, it seems like that needs to be included in the "full disclosure" section of the "validation" confluence page :-) If I don't want to go that route (1 Action : 1 JSP), are there any alternatives short of writing my own validation framework? Thanks, John Kawczynski, David wrote: > Either have lots of actions in your struts.xml, or use wildcard mappings > (http://struts.apache.org/2.0.11.2/docs/wildcard-mappings.html) > > -----Original Message----- > From: 928572663 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 11:43 AM > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: [s2] Problem getting basic server side field validation to > work > > Great - that fixed it. > > Follow up: supposed this Action class can serve up 10 different JSP > pages, all of which need validation. I would want the "input" result > type to forward to whichever of the 10 JSPs that the user was in when > the validation error occurred. So what is the best way to handle that? > > Thanks, > John > > > Kawczynski, David wrote: >> Yes, in the event of server-sided validation failure the framework >> returns the user to this "input" page >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: 928572663 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 11:27 AM >> To: Kawczynski, David >> Cc: Struts Users Mailing List >> Subject: Re: [s2] Problem getting basic server side field validation > to >> work >> >> Thanks David for the quick reply. >> >> Is the 'input' result type used by the validation framework? My > action >> class does not return that. >> >> Thanks, >> John >> >> >> Kawczynski, David wrote: >>> You need to define a <result> of type input for your action. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: 928572663 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 11:02 AM >>> To: Struts Users Mailing List >>> Subject: [s2] Problem getting basic server side field validation to >> work >>> I'm trying to do a very basic test app that demonstrates the server >> side >>> field validation and am getting an exception during initial JSP page >>> rendering. The page and action work fine without the validation. >>> >>> Any ideas what I may be missing? >>> >>> I've read the confluence pages on validation, and have been keeping > up >>> with the many posts on the mailing list, but they all seem to be >> various >>> advanced scenarios. >>> >>> Here is some info to help: >>> >>> * Using struts 2.1.2 basic (no plugins to speak of) >>> * Using Zero Configuration (annotations) with no struts.xml >>> * form bean is stored in session >>> * action function works great w/o validation >>> * when adding the SampleAction-validation.xml the exception happens >>> during initial page rendering >>> >>> Here is the stack and last few logs: >>> >>> >>> DEBUG [] [2008/10/21 09:01:12] >>> [com.opensymphony.xwork2.interceptor.DefaultWorkflowInterceptor] >>> Invoking validate() on action [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> DEBUG [] [2008/10/21 09:01:12] >>> [com.opensymphony.xwork2.interceptor.PrefixMethodInvocationUtil] >> cannot >>> find method [validateDisplayForm] in action >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> DEBUG [] [2008/10/21 09:01:12] >>> [com.opensymphony.xwork2.interceptor.PrefixMethodInvocationUtil] >> cannot >>> find method [validateDoDisplayForm] in action >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> DEBUG [] [2008/10/21 09:01:12] >>> [com.opensymphony.xwork2.interceptor.DefaultWorkflowInterceptor] >> Errors >>> on action [EMAIL PROTECTED], returning result name 'input' >>> ERROR [] [2008/10/21 09:01:12] >>> [org.apache.struts2.dispatcher.Dispatcher] Could not find action or >>> result No result defined for action sample.SampleAction and result >> input >>> at >>> > com.opensymphony.xwork2.DefaultActionInvocation.executeResult(DefaultAct >>> ionInvocation.java:357) >>> at >>> > com.opensymphony.xwork2.DefaultActionInvocation.invoke(DefaultActionInvo >>> cation.java:259) >>> at >>> > com.opensymphony.xwork2.validator.ValidationInterceptor.doIntercept(Vali >>> dationInterceptor.java:248) >>> at >>> > org.apache.struts2.interceptor.validation.AnnotationValidationIntercepto >>> r.doIntercept(AnnotationValidationInterceptor.java:49) >>> at >>> > com.opensymphony.xwork2.interceptor.MethodFilterInterceptor.intercept(Me >>> thodFilterInterceptor.java:86) >>> >>> >>> >>> /SampleAction-validation.xml >>> >>> <!DOCTYPE validators PUBLIC "-//OpenSymphony Group//XWork Validator >>> 1.0.2//EN" >>> "http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd";> >>> <validators> >>> <field name="formBean.lastName"> >>> <field-validator type="requiredstring"> >>> <message>You must enter a Last Name</message> >>> </field-validator> >>> </field> >>> <field name="formBean.maxValue"> >>> <field-validator type="int"> >>> <param name="min">13</param> >>> <param name="max">19</param> >>> <message>The max value must be between 13 and 19</message> >>> </field-validator> >>> </field> >>> </validators> >>> >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Notice: This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains information of Merck & Co., Inc. (One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA 08889), and/or its affiliates (which may be known outside the United States as Merck Frosst, Merck Sharp & Dohme or MSD and in Japan, as Banyu - direct contact information for affiliates is available at http://www.merck.com/contact/contacts.html) that may be confidential, proprietary copyrighted and/or legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named on this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete it from your system. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
