Then perhaps you are reading the wrong book yo! If it's the session you wish, then implement SessionAware. These POJOish interfaces make testing a cake walk.
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 7:25 AM, Nick Maunder | Oathouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Ah ... my book doesn't mention RequestAware at all... useless!! lol > > Preseumably the objects I want to get at (the session data primarily) are > then accessible as plain old java, and can be tested using JUnit? > > could you give me a pointer to find out more? > > Nick > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 24 October 2008 13:19 > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: Unit Testing Action Classes that are "Aware" > > Unless you really *need* to bind your actions to Http* types, you should > use > RequestAware. This allows the same end goal indirectly through a Map. > > Scott > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 7:10 AM, Nick Maunder | Oathouse > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > > > I'm fairly new to Struts 2 > > > > > > > > I'm looking for a way of unit testing Struts 2 action classes which are > > (for > > example) ServletRequestAware. > > > > > > > > Cactus (the old way I did it) does not appear suitable (or is it and I'm > > missing something?) and HttpUnit does not seem to do the job either. I > can > > test all of the parts of the class which are not aware using JUnit, but I > > really want to test the methods that are using the HttpServletRequest. > > Ideas would be gratefully accepted. > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > Nick > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
