hi,

my app has three packages public, sucurity (login,register,...) and private.
These packages correspond in that all actions within this package should be
displayed with  the same menus. Therefore (i guess) i have (not yet, but
this is my idea) three base layouts from which to extend:

<definition name="public.layout" template="/layouts/publicLayout.ftl">
  <put-attribute name="menu" value="/tiles/public/common_menu.ftl" />
  <put-attribute name="body" value="/tiles/public/empty_body.ftl" />
</definition>

<definition name="security.layout" template="/layouts/securityLayout.ftl">
  <put-attribute name="menu" value="/tiles/security/common_menu.ftl" />
  <put-attribute name="body" value="/tiles/security/empty_body.ftl" />
</definition>

<definition name="private.layout" template="/layouts/privateLayout.ftl">
  <put-attribute name="menu" value="/tiles/private/common_menu.ftl" />
  <put-attribute name="body" value="/tiles/private/empty_body.ftl" />
</definition>

There seem to be three different ways to achieve my goal (with Tiles 2.1):
1) using Wildcards:

<definition name="package_*.body_*" extends"{1}.layout">
  <put-attribute name="body" value="/tiles/{1}/{2}.ftl" />
</definition>

In that case my action mapping would have to provide the package name:
<package name="public" namespace="/public" ...>
  ...
  <action...>
    ...
    <result type="tiles">
      package_public.body_nextPage <!-- hardcoded package name -->
    </result>
  </action>

</package>

Is there a better possiblity to replace the hardcoded package name with
something i don't have to type every time than extending the tiles-Result
with:

public class CustomTilesResult extends TilesResult{

  public void setLocation( String location ) {
    this.location =
"package_"+ServletActionContext.getActionMapping.getNamespace().substring(1)+
                        ".body_"+location;
  }
}

2)using EL:
<definition name="*" extends"${package}.layout">
  <put-attribute name="body" value="/tiles/${package}/{1}.ftl" />
</definition>

This is much nicer than 1) because i don't have to code anything for the
action mappings. But is there an expression to compute the current package
with the EL? And how do i enable EL when i don't user the 
http://tiles.apache.org/framework/tutorial/advanced/el-support.html
TilesServlet   but the TilesListener (because i want
FreeMarker-integreation)?
Do i have access to the value stack when using the EL?

3)using a ViewPreparer to create the right menu:
in this version i wouldn't have my three base layouts but only one with a
viewpreparer that initialises the menu structure
<definition name="*" template="/layouts/baseLayout.ftl"
preparer="MenuViewPreparer">
  <put-attribute name="menu" value="/tiles/dynamic_menu.ftl" />
  <put-attribute name="body" value="/tiles/{1}.ftl" />
</definition>

So the MenuViewPrepare would by responsible to figure out which package is
used. That should work like this:
public void execute(TilesRequestContext tilesContext, AttributeContext
attributeContext) {
  switch( ServletActionContext.getActionMapping.getNamespace() ) {
    case: ...
{


Which approach is preferable? Is there an even better approach?

I don't understand the "if you need"-part of this statement 
http://tiles.apache.org/framework/getting_started.html "if you need JSP
support, copy the tiles-jsp-VERSION.jar in the WEB-INF/lib directory of your
web application" . 
Don't you always use the JSP-Tags at least in your baseLayout-File?
I guess i also have to include this when using FreeMarker because i call the
JSP-Tags from within FreeMarker too!?

Regards,
Stephan
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/different-tiles-definition-depending-on-the-package-of-the-action-mapping-tp20206579p20206579.html
Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to