Thanks to all replies! I really appreciated all replies all are really helpful and informative.
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Gabriel Belingueres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Pros: > Easy to learn and start with (some free books available.) > Great community (mailing list.) > Very extensible. > > Cons: > Sporadic releases. > Javascript validation framework is very limited for non ajax apps. > Multiple rendering technologies make their component model hard to > modify or extends (parallel class hierarchies for both components and > tags, and component's HTML code and styles are tied to a particular > theme.) > > 2008/11/7 Néstor Boscán <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi Ryan > > > > In my experience: > > > > Pros: > > > > 1.- Form mapping!!!. Yes form mapping in Struts 1 is horrible. > > 2.- Conversion support > > 3.- Interceptor support > > 4.- Better AJAX Support > > 5.- Lightweight vs JSF > > > > The framework is very flexible and you can adjust it to your needs. > > > > Cons: > > > > 1.- Themes. They make the framework harder to understand and slower, and > to > > me adds little value. > > 2.- Validation is OK, but need better validation support like validation > of > > list items. And the ability to validate a specific Action method in a > > straightforward way. Better JavaScript support. > > 3.- Struts 2 Tags should be more flexible. > > So there it is. > > On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:18 PM, ryan webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Can anyone share to me some of the things you like about > >> Struts 2 as well some of the things you don't like about struts 2? > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- warmest regards, Ryan Webb - Philippines email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
