Like this?
Boolean isValidUser(String user) {
}
And from the method you're calling it:
isValidUser(request.getRemoteUser());
?
Nils-H
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 2:41 PM, nikunj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ravindra,
>
> RequestAware/SessionAware return Map object.
>
> But in my Utility class I have used following method like this way
>
> Boolean isValidUser(HttpServletRequest request)
> {
> String role = request. getRemoteUser();
> }
>
>
> How can I get value of getRemoteUser using Map?
>
> After,
>
> Boolean isValidUser(Map request)
> {
> String role = request. get(__________);
> }
>
> Wht Is should write in above blank
>
> Regards,
> Nikunj
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ravindra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 7:01 PM
> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> Subject: RE: ExecuteAndWaitInterceptor Issue - ThreadLocal object
>
> Hey nikunj,
>
> Why don't you implement SessionAware in your action and try?
>
> This means if you need to access, for example, session data, you need to
> implement SessionAware rather than calling ActionContext.getSession().
>
> Regards,
> ravindra
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nikunj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 6:54 PM
> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> Subject: RE: ExecuteAndWaitInterceptor Issue - ThreadLocal object
>
> Nils,
>
> Try to understand my problem.
> I don't wana change my method signature.
> I have no problem to make another overloaded method.
> But I don't want to change my original method.
> You replied me with changing my original method.
>
> Boolean isValidUser(HttpServletRequest request)
> {
> // don't want to change content of function
> }
>
>
> Boolean isValidUser(Map<String,Object> requestMap)
> {
> ______________________________
> Need to change over here but what?
> Please describe clearly. Not like extractDataFromRequest function
> }
>
>
> Regards,
> Nikunj
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 2:26 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: ExecuteAndWaitInterceptor Issue - ThreadLocal object
>
> The other way around, something like this:
>
> Boolean isValidUser(HttpServletRequest request) {
> Map data = extractDataFromRequest(request);
> isValidUser(data);
> }
>
> Boolean isValidUser(Map data) {
> }
>
> Note that you can't use the Struts 2 RequestMap either since it's
> backed by the actual request object. So either you have to copy the
> values in the map, or even better, extract the actual
> objects/parameters the method need to do it's logic and pass them as
> parameters instead.
>
> Nils-H
>
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 9:34 AM, nikunj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ha ha
>>
>>
>> You are right.
>>
>> But I'm having method like
>>
>> Boolean isValidUser(HttpServletRequest request)
>> {
>> }
>>
>>
>> As u said, I am going to make another
>>
>> Boolean isValidUser(Map<String,Object> requestMap)
>> {
>> ______________________________
>> }
>>
>>
>> Now tell me what I should write in above blank line to call my actual
>> function.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Nikunj
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 1:32 PM
>> To: Struts Users Mailing List
>> Subject: Re: ExecuteAndWaitInterceptor Issue - ThreadLocal object
>>
>> I'm having a hard time understanding why refactoring your utility
>> class would have a serious impact on the migration time. If it's just
>> that you don't want to change the signature of your utility method
>> because it's used many other places, then create a new utility method
>> with the required parameters and extract the common bits. That way you
>> have kept your old method, created a new one and shared the common
>> code between them:
>>
>> Before:
>>
>> public static void doSomething(HttpServletRequest request) {
>> // Do something with the request
>> }
>>
>> After:
>>
>> public static void doSomething(HttpServletRequest request) {
>> // Extract params from request
>> doSomething(param1, param2, param3);
>> }
>>
>> public static void doSomething(Object param1, Object param2, Object
> param3)
>> {
>> // Do whatever you need with the params
>> }
>>
>> Nils-H
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 7:57 AM, nikunj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>> Thanks Nils-H
>>>
>>> Actually I am migrating my existing application, need to reduce migration
>>> time.
>>>
>>> Is there any way to make request object as common for all available
>> thread,
>>> So that we no need to extract the information of request object.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Nikunj
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 12:16 PM
>>> To: Struts Users Mailing List
>>> Subject: Re: ExecuteAndWaitInterceptor Issue - ThreadLocal object
>>>
>>> As you say, the request object can be recycled by the container after
>>> the thread has executed [1]. You can't "fix" this as it's up to the
>>> container to handle this. You have to refactor your code so it's not
>>> passing the request object around to different threads. Typically you
>>> would extract the information you need from the request and pass the
>>> data you nedd to the new thread instead.
>>>
>>> Nils-H
>>>
>>> [1] - Servlet 2.4 specification, section SRV.4.10
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 6:29 AM, nikunj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>> Dear All,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Servlet container is written to be single-threaded.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That means that the "request" object isn't designed to be used after the
>>>>
>>>> thread that handled the request has finished executing. What is
>>>>
>>>> happening is this:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 1) Thread1 handles request
>>>>
>>>> 2) Thread1 gives request to Tomcat
>>>>
>>>> 3) Tomcat starts Thread2 and executes your action
>>>>
>>>> 4) Thread1 finishes and cleans up request
>>>>
>>>> 5) Your action (on Thread2) tries to use the request
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Step #5 causes an exception in the container. Null pointer exeception
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How to fix this issue?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Can any body help me?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nikunj Mulani
>>>>
>>>> Applied Software Pvt. Ltd.
>>>>
>>>> Ahmedabad
>>>>
>>>> 91-98249 88262
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>> __________ NOD32 3641 (20081126) Information __________
>>>
>>> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>> __________ NOD32 3641 (20081126) Information __________
>>
>> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>> http://www.eset.com
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> __________ NOD32 3641 (20081126) Information __________
>
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> __________ NOD32 3642 (20081126) Information __________
>
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
