Yes, I'm aware of that requirement. Unfortunately, no it's not supported. It's one of the things I wanted to do right from the beginning, but haven't managed to do since it would require quite a big change in the tags/components in the core. With JSR286 this is of course even more important since the new spec makes it easier to write AJAX-portlets. "id" is not a big issue since you can pass it in by yourself, but I guess "name" would be harder to namespace. But as you know, JSR286 is currently work in progress, so I'll have to put it on my list (or even better, register a JIRA issue). Patches (not only to this issue) are also very welcome :)
Nils-H On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 2:40 AM, Torsten Krah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 27. November 2008 19:13:01 schrieb Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik: >> The portlet namespace should be transparent from the portlet point of >> view when getting request parameters. I've not had problems with this >> when I have been testing. > > Yeah thats right. > But from the "jsp" perspective, does it work there too? > Does all s: tags render "ids / name" values which are "namespace" prefixed? > This would enable you to write js code (must be also namespace prefixed) and > the same portlet would work correctly if there are more than one instance of > it on one page. > Hope you understand what i mean. > > If this is what you meant too, than great if this is working, i should take a > closer look at jsr268 portlet support in struts2. > > -- > Bitte senden Sie mir keine Word- oder PowerPoint-Anhänge. > Siehe http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.de.html > > Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a > completely unintentional side effect." > -- Linus Torvalds > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
