I would be interested in seeing new benchmark results if anyone happens to
generate some. Might want to avoid database-based tests due to caching.
> Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 16:19:36 -0500> From: pierre.thibaud...@gmail.com> To:
> user@struts.apache.org> Subject: Re: Performance issue> > Yes the model is
> *exactly* the same in the two cases. In fact, both> S1 and S2 exist
> concurrently in the same Tomcat application.> > Each test is run using
> JMeter, with 10 users who randomly try to> access one of 42 different pages
> involving 10 different types of> results (that is, roughly speaking, 10
> different JSPs, abstracting> from the fact that each page is really composed
> of 6 or 7 different> JSP tiles). In total, roughly 1,600 pages were queried
> for each test.> Moreover, each test was performed after re-starting Tomcat,
> once the> pages had been warmed up.> > My last post in this thread was fairly
> extreme, and I felt the need to> make new tests that relied on fewer
> assumptions and more on hard> facts. So I modified the pages tested as best I
> could, in order to> make the respective S1 pages and S2 pages as close to
> identical as> possible. In particular, this meant beefing up my old S1
> pages,> adding to them some of the more recent sections that existed only in>
> the S2 version: mostly (but not exclusively) a lot of javascrip/dojo> stuff,
> which is not interpreted anyway by JMeter. (I don't rely on S2> for dojo, but
> provide my own; and yes, I package and shrinksafe it).> > Since my original
> timing for S1 pages were so ridiculously low (often> under 10 ms!!!), the new
> beefed-up S1 pages were bound to be> significantly slower.> On average, with
> the beefed-up pages, S1 pages take 74 ms to load.> > Since last running the
> S2 tests (about 4 days ago), I did a fair> amount of optimizing and I
> replaced the most obvious <s:tags> by> <c:ones> in about half of the JSPs. I
> therefore re-ran the tests just> before writing this current post.> There is
> a marked improvement and, on average, S2 pages load in 169 ms.> > In other
> words, I may have been a little (!) hasty in posting my> previous statement!
> (*blushing*) My apologies to all the people who> care about S2!!!> We are
> happily very far from the apocalyptic 30x factor that I had> previously
> observed. (Some tests last week were showing averages of> 580 ms per
> S2-page!)> > As I am under pressure, I may not have time immediately to set
> up a> new test to compare the most recent result with the case of S2 pages>
> that entirely rely on <s:tags>, though that would be very> enlightening. If I
> can get round to it, I promise to post the> results!> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------> To
> unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org> For additional
> commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org>
_________________________________________________________________
It’s the same Hotmail®. If by “same” you mean up to 70% faster.
http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_broad1_122008
