I think I probably always use explicit mapping in annotation or XML, and not using the wild card fall-back mapping. It won't be too much burden for me to explicitly do that and that's also less error-prone. Thanks a lot for your suggestion!
Wes Wannemacher wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 21:09 -0800, Daniel Woo wrote: >> I am using Conventions since annotation is moved into Conventions in >> 2.1.2. >> The problem is that I like explicit declaration of Action/URL/namespace >> etc >> in annotations rather than implicit declaration provided by Convertion, >> only >> for a few simple JSP files I want it to be mapped implicitly with a >> wild-card in struts.xml. It seems that it's impossible to do that, I have >> to >> either use implicit with Conventions suggested, or use explicit >> declaration >> without "default mapping" > > It's not necessarily either implicit with Conventions or explicit with > XML... I mix the two all the time. The problem is really just the > wildcard. Go ahead and map all the actions you want, either in XML or > annotations. What I was suggesting is that you simply adopt the > convention for default mappings for the actions you are trying to catch > with your wildcard. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/default-mapping-with-annotation-tp21366005p21366866.html Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
