thanks for the comments. We have this page: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Converting+application+from+Codebehind+to+Convention+Plugin
which is linked from the Convention Plugin page. If you have filed a CLA feel free to edit that page and add/edit content. musachy On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:26 PM, denis cabasson <denis.cabas...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks, I will test that and let you know how it is working out. > > I have supplied some useful information as a comment on the wiki page you > previously mentionned. I believe this information is important for people > looking for backward compatibility, as I was. > > Thanks for your help! > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Musachy Barroso <musa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Fixed in trunk. This is the ticket: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2994 >> >> See "Overwriting plugin classes" in >> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Convention+Plugin for >> details. >> >> musachy >> >> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Musachy Barroso <musa...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > The implementation is defined as a bean, but we didn't provide a way >> > to change the bean used. That means you can't plugin your >> > implementation without building the plugin yourself. I will fix in >> > trunk soon, if you want to build it yourself, you need to change this >> > file: >> > >> > /plugins/convention/src/main/resources/struts-plugin.xml >> > >> > and change this line: >> > >> > <bean type="org.apache.struts2.convention.ActionNameBuilder" >> > class="org.apache.struts2.convention.SEOActionNameBuilder"/> >> > >> > with your actual class. >> > >> > musachy >> > >> > On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:16 PM, denis cabasson >> > <denis.cabas...@polytechnique.org> wrote: >> >> Hi folks! >> >> >> >> I am using Struts 2.0.14 on a project with a fairly big existing >> codebase. I >> >> just tried to upgrade to struts 2.1.6 (as the release is now in GA). >> >> We were using extensively the zero configuration approach with the >> >> codebehind plugin and I am now looking at upgrading to the convention >> >> plugin. >> >> >> >> My last remaining hurdle is the change in the ActionNameBuilder. The >> plugin >> >> uses the SEOActionNameBuilder which is a big change from what we had in >> >> Struts 2.0.14 : The name of our action is no longer myProfile, but >> >> my-profile, which involves changing all existing references to the >> action by >> >> its name (and we have quite a fex of them). >> >> >> >> So I'd like to use the convention plugin, with DefaultActionNameBuilder >> >> instead of the SEO. I configured struts.xml to have this bean created, >> my >> >> question is how do I get the convention plugin to use that one rather >> than >> >> the SEO one? >> >> >> >> Thanks for your help, and keep up the good work, you the struts team! >> >> >> >> Denis. >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org >> >> > -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
