markbeek wrote:
Can anyone (a) confirm this analysis of the source code, and (b) if so,
explain why the decision was made to consider zero an invalid entry for a
double property on a form field?

I believe it was probably what's conventionally known as a "mistake".

It appears to have been resolved with XW-677.

Dave


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org

Reply via email to