And that is why I love Groovy's "import something as somethingelse" :)
musachy On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:35 AM, <musom...@aol.com> wrote: > We are at the point where in many cases we will want an action to > 1. implement Action (for configuration by convention purposes) and also > 2. use the @Action annotation > So we are faced with either using fully qualified names for one of the > 'Action's or taking the route of extending ActionSupport and losing the > chance to extend anything else. Perhaps in later versions we could have fewer > things called Action? > Chris M > > > -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
