Ahh here we go. Just read the struts 2.0 -> 2.1 migration guide and
saw this:
"The default action extension list (struts.action.extension) has
changed from just 'action' to 'action' plus "" (no extension). If your
application has servlets or other requests that have no extension then
they will be mistaken as actions and you will get a "There is no
Action mapped for ..." exception like below."
This explains the difference with regard to handling the mentioned
URIs. So i can just do that:
<constant name="struts.action.extension" value="action" />
to get the old "2.0.x" bevaior. Unfortunately i created a custom
ActionMapper the wont handle /services/* URIs. Hmmm. Lets see what i
do now :)
---
regards
Marc Logemann
http://www.logemann.org
http://www.logentis.de
Am 03.04.2009 um 11:54 schrieb Marc Logemann:
Hi,
i have the following web.xml:
<filter>
<filter-name>struts2</filter-name>
<filter-
class
>
org
.apache.struts2.dispatcher.ng.filter.StrutsPrepareAndExecuteFilter</
filter-class>
</filter>
<filter-mapping>
<filter-name>struts2</filter-name>
<url-pattern>/*</url-pattern>
</filter-mapping>
<servlet>
<servlet-name>CXFServlet</servlet-name>
<servlet-class>
org.apache.cxf.transport.servlet.CXFServlet
</servlet-class>
<load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup>
</servlet>
<servlet-mapping>
<servlet-name>CXFServlet</servlet-name>
<url-pattern>/services/*</url-pattern>
</servlet-mapping>
No as you can see, i want all URLs resolved by Struts2 but /
services/ should be handled by CXF. This worked with Struts 2.0.x
and CXF but with latest Struts2, the Filter seems to be changed.
Apart from the fact that i know use StrutsPrepareAndExecuteFilter
instead of FilterDispatchter (using FilterDispatcher makes no
difference regarding my problem), it seems that Struts2 now treats
every URL as it should be processed by the framework, even without
mapping and namespaces for it.
The ciritical point is the following code in the Struts filter:
ActionMapping mapping = prepare.findActionMapping(request, response);
if (mapping == null) {
boolean handled =
execute.executeStaticResourceRequest(request, response);
if (!handled) {
chain.doFilter(request, response);
}
}
If it wouldnt find a mapping (in fact there is no mapping but the
object is nevertheless != null) i think it would work because
executeStaticResourceRequest() would return false and the normal
processing chain of the Request would occur.
I cant change the struts2 url filter mapping beause that would break
so much code of my existing app that i would rather modify the
Filter not to handle "/service" urls. Again all this is because of a
very poor web.xml (servlet) spec with regard to simple url-pattern
without the chance to exclude something....
Any hints ??
---
regards
Marc Logemann
http://www.logemann.org
http://www.logentis.de
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
