Thank you Martin for yet another text wall,random, off topic, and
uninformative post. I am starting to appreciate the advantages of
having forums instead of mailing lists...captcha.

musachy

On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Martin Gainty<mgai...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> web.xml configuration for Spring
> /* The ContextLoaderListener listener should be registered after
>  Log4jConfigListener
>  in web.xml, if the latter is used.
> */
>    <listener>
>        
> <listener-class>org.springframework.web.context.ContextLoaderListener</listener-class>
>    </listener>
>
> once thats configured you'll want to use MethodInvokingFactoryBean for 
> FactoryBean which returns a value which is the result of a static or instance
>  method invocation
>
> http://static.springsource.org/spring/docs/1.2.x/api/org/springframework/beans/factory/config/MethodInvokingFactoryBean.html
>
> as mentioned singleton="true" assures you will load,instantiate and store a 
> cached bean
>
> static factory methods:
> An example (in an XML based bean factory definition) of a bean definition
>  which uses this class to call a STATIC factory method:
> <bean id="myObject" 
> class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.MethodInvokingFactoryBean">
>   <property 
> name="staticMethod"><value>com.whatever.MyClassFactory.getInstance</value></property>
> </bean>
>
> <!-- this example will acquire a (target) instance specific version of System 
> defined (version) property -->
>  <bean id="sysProps" 
> class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.MethodInvokingFactoryBean">
>   <property name="targetClass"><value>java.lang.System</value></property>
>   <property name="targetMethod"><value>getProperties</value></property>
>  </bean>
>  <bean id="javaVersion" 
> class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.MethodInvokingFactoryBean">
>   <property name="targetObject"><ref local="sysProps"/></property>
>   <property name="targetMethod"><value>getProperty</value></property>
>   <property name="arguments">
>     <list>
>       <value>java.version</value>
>     </list>
>   </property>
>  </bean>Since your question addresses GarbageCollection it would be good to 
> know the difference
> between Spring's Beans loader between ApplicationContext (a load class which 
> implements ApplicationContextAware) and BeanFactory (a class which implements 
> BeanFactoryAware)
> BeanFactory:
> 1a)Container locates beans definition (usually derivation of *beans.xml)
> 1b)Container Loads beans into Container
> 2)is instantiated LATER with getBean() method
>
> ApplicationContext:
> 1a)Container locates beans definition depeding on invoking class
> -ClassPathXMLApplicationContext-Loads XML from Classpath
> -FileSystemXMLApplicationContext-Loads context from XML file in filesystem
> -XMLWebApplicationContext-Loads Context from 
> XML(beans.xml/ApplicationContext.xml) contained with webApplication
> 1b)Container loads and instantiates all beans into Container
>
> so if you see alot of GC activity from jheap or J2EE Server logs you will 
> probably want to consider using BeanFactoryAware implementor class instead of 
> default ApplicationContextAware implementor class
>
> hope this helps
> Martin Gainty
> ______________________________________________
> Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung
>
> Diese Nachricht ist vertraulich. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene Empfaenger 
> sein, so bitten wir hoeflich um eine Mitteilung. Jede unbefugte Weiterleitung 
> oder Fertigung einer Kopie ist unzulaessig. Diese Nachricht dient lediglich 
> dem Austausch von Informationen und entfaltet keine rechtliche 
> Bindungswirkung. Aufgrund der leichten Manipulierbarkeit von E-Mails koennen 
> wir keine Haftung fuer den Inhalt uebernehmen.
>
>
>
>
>
>> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:10:17 -0400
>> From: d...@newfield.org
>> To: user@struts.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Actions are not Garbage Collected
>>
>> Musachy Barroso wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 7:53 AM, Musachy Barroso<musa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> If your actions are singletons (and they shouldn't be!) then they
>> >> are not likely to be collected.
>> >
>> > because a reference to them will be held by spring, or whatever
>> > container you are using.
>>
>> Or maybe clickstream?  http://www.opensymphony.com/clickstream
>>
>> A brief look at the source
>> https://svn.opensymphony.com/svn/clickstream/trunk appears to indicate
>> that it only saves stuff extracted from the request object, but maybe I
>> missed where it's also saving a reference to the request (and therefore
>> the action) itself?
>>
>> -Dale
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
>>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Lauren found her dream laptop. Find the PC that’s right for you.
> http://www.microsoft.com/windows/choosepc/?ocid=ftp_val_wl_290



-- 
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org

Reply via email to