Thanks to both. The haze on the subject is beginning to clear. mitch
Musachy Barroso wrote: > yes that's a good catch Dale, from the API point of view they are > stored in a map in the ValueStack instance, but from a user point of > view you could say they are stored in the "valuestack context". > > musachy > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Dale Newfield<d...@newfield.org> wrote: > >> Musachy Barroso wrote: >> >>> Objects can be put in the stack by name, like the HttpServletRequest >>> object. Theseobjects are accessed using the "#" notation, like >>> "#request". The "set" tag can add things to the stack by name(for >>> example). >>> >> The only confusing bit about the way that was just described is that things >> put into scope are not added to the stack. There's both a stack of objects >> and a hash mapping names to objects. When you "set" something you're adding >> it to the hash table, not the value stack. To later address something in >> this hash table you prefix it with #. >> >> -Dale >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org >> >> >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
