this is c.tld (tag library descriptor for struts core taglib)
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?> <!DOCTYPE taglib PUBLIC "-//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD JSP Tag Library 1.2//EN" "http://java.sun.com/dtd/web-jsptaglibrary_1_2.dtd";> <taglib> <tlib-version>1.0</tlib-version> <jsp-version>1.2</jsp-version> <short-name>c</short-name> <uri>http://java.sun.com/jstl/core</uri> <display-name>JSTL core</display-name> <description>JSTL 1.0 core library</description> which targets JSTL 1.0 (not JSTL 1.2) Martin Gainty ______________________________________________ Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung/Note de déni et de confidentialité Diese Nachricht ist vertraulich. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene Empfaenger sein, so bitten wir hoeflich um eine Mitteilung. Jede unbefugte Weiterleitung oder Fertigung einer Kopie ist unzulaessig. Diese Nachricht dient lediglich dem Austausch von Informationen und entfaltet keine rechtliche Bindungswirkung. Aufgrund der leichten Manipulierbarkeit von E-Mails koennen wir keine Haftung fuer den Inhalt uebernehmen. Ce message est confidentiel et peut être privilégié. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, nous te demandons avec bonté que pour satisfaire informez l'expéditeur. N'importe quelle diffusion non autorisée ou la copie de ceci est interdite. Ce message sert à l'information seulement et n'aura pas n'importe quel effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email peuvent facilement être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité pour le contenu fourni. > Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 07:35:49 -0700 > From: tommy...@yahoo.com > Subject: Re: possible bug in v2.1.6 ?? > To: user@struts.apache.org > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: Wes Wannemacher <w...@wantii.com> > > To: Struts Users Mailing List <user@struts.apache.org> > > Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2009 7:18:06 AM > > Subject: Re: possible bug in v2.1.6 ?? > > > > I'm pretty sure the problem is that by default tomcat only maps *.jsp > > to the jsp servlet. You can try to setup an extra servlet mapping in > > your web.xml, but if you can use .jsp instead of .jspf, you're > > probably better off. > > > > You are right, it is a convention to use .jspf (for JSP Fragment), but > > it looks like Tomcat devs forgot about that one ;) > > > > -Wes > > > > > > Hi Wes, > > Why then does it work with Servlet+JSP+JSTL1.2 on the same exact dev system? > I'd would agree with you if it fails with just the basics. > > Thanks, > Tommy > > > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Tommy Phamwrote: > > > > > > Hi Wes, > > > > > > Thank you very much for fast response and solution to my problem (didn't > > > think > > about trying with this). Yes, changing from jspf to jsp works as desired. > > Is > > my implementation wrong? I remember reading somewhere (I can't remember > > where) > > that by convention, jsp fragments should be used with extension .jspf and > > placed > > inside /WEB-INF/jspf/*.jspf where my jspf files are located currently. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Tommy > > > > > > -- > > Wes Wannemacher > > > > Head Engineer, WanTii, Inc. > > Need Training? Struts, Spring, Maven, Tomcat... > > Ask me for a quote! > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org > _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail® is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast. http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=PID23391::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HYGN_faster:082009
