On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Johannes Geppert <jo...@web.de> wrote:
> > *Only* in the trivial cases. > Not only, but in the most cases. > YMMV; for me, my requirements are so different from project to project, including requiring different underlying libraries. I have *some* commonality, which I handle via JavaScript. > And JavaScript is for the most Struts2 Users not the language of choose. > ;-) > That's their loss, though--*any* customization requires knowing JavaScript anyway. IMO it's more dangerous to lull users into a false sense of complancency. Thats the point you refactor it, and after some change you > must refactor it again and again. This is a lot of stupid work. > With an taglib you are faster in your development process > Until you're not, which for all but the most trivial usecases, is very frequently. > And you reinvent the wheel in every project? You can wrote your own taglib, > but not every Struts2 User can do this. > Who can't write a JSP-based tag library? If they can't, they probably shouldn't be coding in the first place. Dave
