Dave Newton-6 wrote:
>
> Correct--the essence of implementation is just a "dual-layer" context with
> the additional key passed back and forth (I assume for every request).
>
Hi Dave,
Doesn't seem too complicated to implement :) - but given this conversation
from Jan 2009
http://old.nabble.com/Struts-2-session-problem-td21513305i40.html and this
from November 2006
http://old.nabble.com/-s2--Multiple-Session-Conversations-Using-Same-Action-td7364935.html#a7364935,
it would appear that it either proved too complicated or there was
insufficient "push". Any insights?
Regards
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Struts-2%2C-Session-Management-and-%22WorkFlow%22.-tp29726121p29728192.html
Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org