On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Dave Newton <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I'm not sure what reasons there would be to have it make sense
>> to store each entity in its own identically-structured DB.
>
> Ever had a client that wanted/required their data segregated from
> everybody else's (this is not uncommon at all)? Ever wanted to
Apparently, it is uncommon. I've never encountered such a demand.
> restrict tool access to data without jumping through any hoops
> ("here's the DB, here's your username/password, here's your data, and
> nobody else's")?
I haven't been in this type of situation, either. Projects I've
worked on have always had user-friendly reports on the data, and what
little we host for people hasn't called for constantly available
direct DB access.
That said, I do appreciate seeing a couple of these reasons; after all
it *is* always helpful to get some perspective outside my own
experience.
-Brian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]