checked CheckboxInterceptor and see what it does. I guess no way around it PS as for what I checked before - that was lift and wicked..somehow I found it friendlier but hey that might be just my opinion :-)
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Dave Newton <davelnew...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hidden parameters are the only way to get a value for an unchecked > checkbox, that's just how HTML works. But yes, you're wrong; the > checkbox interceptor does the work for you. Please read the > documentation and just try it. > > Dave > > (Cumbersome? Compared to what?) > > On Monday, October 25, 2010, Peter Bliznak <pbliz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Sorry about "of course" we have over two dozens of s1 apps and evaluating > if > > s2 makes sense to switch to or go with something else. > > And for that we have over 50 items to cover to see how difficult/easy it > is > > in s2. > > I am really surprise that such a trivial task has to be done using hidden > > parameters. > > Just to be sure : you really meant to assign dynamically hidden parameter > > values inside iterator? -- and then -- since you will end up with 2 > > collections to go ahead and compared them and figure out what is "missing > in > > one of them" and so to get values from the other?...I hope I am wrong - > > sounds very cumbersome for 2010. > > > > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Dave Newton <davelnew...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> Same way they're generated now, with the checkbox tag, or by hand. Or > use a > >> map. > >> > >> And there's no "of course": people use both versions. > >> > >> Dave > >> > >> On Monday, October 25, 2010, Peter Bliznak <pbliz...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > Hi Dave, > >> > using S2 of course. > >> > not sure I am getting what you suggested. I have dynamic list and have > no > >> > idea what size is going to be (inside my jsp which was created prior > to > >> that > >> > call)-- how would you then create hidden parameters dynamically? > >> > > >> > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Dave Newton <davelnew...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Which version of Struts? > >> >> > >> >> Struts 2 uses a hidden field to deal with default (unchecked) values. > >> >> Struts 1 ActionForms used the reset() method to pre-load default > >> >> values. > >> >> > >> >> Dave > >> >> > >> >> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Peter Bliznak <pbliz...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> >> > Hi, > >> >> > I have a list over which I am iterating - it has checkbox and other > >> >> fields. > >> >> > I know I can define array associated with checkbox's values but > that > >> only > >> >> > returns values which were checked. In my other column I have date > and > >> I > >> >> have > >> >> > to make that date associated with checkbox's state. How am I > supposed > >> to > >> >> do > >> >> > that?........Say I get five values in table and decide to check 2 > of > >> them > >> >> > but array is only going to return true for 2 elements ...Is there > any > >> way > >> >> I > >> >> > would define collection/array for checkboxes and it would return > ALL > >> >> value > >> >> > including those which were unchecked?... > >> >> > Regards > >> >> > Peter. > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org > >> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org > >
