I prefer SM. You should consider that both use different approaches: 1. tiles uses composition pattern. 2. SM decoration pattern instead.
SM needs to wrap every response, in order to decorate them, and after sends output to browser. So if one of your goals is performance or even you need to handle big outputs, SM is not the best choice. 2010/11/26 Volker Karlmeier <vol...@magiccode.eu>: > I prefer tiles :) > > Am 26.11.2010 um 08:55 schrieb webmeiker <i...@webmeiker.com>: > >> Hi, >> >> Based on your experience, what do you consider the “best” technology for >> layout in Struts2? >> >> Do you recommend me Sitemesh, Tiles2 or what? >> >> >> >> (Personally, I think the latest should be the “best”, because it’s developed >> with improvement over similar/current technologies in mind. But this is a >> debateable question.) >> >> >> Thanks >> >> -- > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org > > -- Maurizio Cucchiara --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
