It *is* the default namespace, but almost always ends up being confusing at some point. The minimal namespace I recommend is "/".
There's no direct relationship between package and namespace other than a package has a namespace--I always figured it was to allow decoupling of paths and packages. Dave On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Greg Akins <angryg...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Maurizio Cucchiara > <maurizio.cucchi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Did you try ParentPackage Annotation? > > Also I'm not sure that empty string for namespace is the best value. > > No. > > I put them in the same package to get them working and figured I could > experiment from there. > > I'm still a little confused about the relationship between namespace & > package. I thought the struts docs suggested an empty string as the > "default" namespace. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org > >
