I have a st of chained actions, in order A, B, C.  

A has a getter for Foo.  B does not have a getter/setter for Foo.  C has a 
setter for Foo.  It seems that A cannot provide C the value of Foo without B 
also "participating" and implementing a getter/setter for Foo.  Yuck.

Do I understand things correctly or have I configured my chain incorrectly?


Regards,
Alan


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org

Reply via email to