Hi Gary, All the configurations can be found at [1] and specifically the proxy configuration is at [2].
You may compare the Synapse/ESB approach over the mule one which is [3] (this configuration contains all the three scenarios) Thanks, Ruwan [1] - https://wso2.org/repos/wso2/trunk/commons/performance/esb/Round_3/ [2] - https://wso2.org/repos/wso2/trunk/commons/performance/esb/Round_3/mule/2.0.1/conf/proxy.xml [3] - https://wso2.org/repos/wso2/trunk/commons/performance/esb/Round_3/wso2/synapse.xml On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 2:11 AM, Gary Rudolph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ruwan, > If you don't mind do you have the mule config? I'm wondering what connector > was being used? i.e. Axis, CXF, etc. > > Thanks, Gary > > > On Jun 23, 2008, at 10:34 AM, Ruwan Linton wrote: > > Hi Ross and all, >> >> In case if you want to have a look at the performance comparisons of >> latest versions of the ESBs including >> • a proprietary ESB >> • Apache Service Mix 3.2.1 >> • Mule Community Edition 2.0.1 (Mule CE) >> • a proprietary version of an open source ESB >> • WSO2 ESB 1.7 / Apache Synapse 1.2 >> here is the third round of the performance test results [1]. >> >> BTW: Ross, were you able to run any of the performance tests? >> >> Thanks, >> Ruwan >> >> [1] - http://wso2.org/library/3740 >> >> -- >> Ruwan Linton >> http://wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform" >> http://ruwansblog.blogspot.com/ >> > > -- Ruwan Linton http://wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform" http://ruwansblog.blogspot.com/
