On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 09:08, Asankha C. Perera <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I suggest we use the property mediator itself for [1] and [2] as follows;
>>
>> <property name="string" [action=set|remove] (value="literal" |
>> expression="xpath") (node="clone" | "detach")
>> [scope=transport|axis2|axis2-client]/>
>>
>> where, the introduced attribute node declares that it is a node operation
>> and this option is valid only when the action is "set" and the expression
>> attribute is present. So the clone attribute value clones the node and
>> attach it as a node to the specified property name and the detach value
>> will
>> remove the node form the message and attach as a property.
>>
>> With this we preserve the earlier behavior of the property mediator, if
>> you
>> do not specify the node attribute it will be the string value of the
>> expression that we are going to be storing in the property.
>>
>
> What about
> <property name="string"  (value="literal" | expression="xpath")
> [action=set|remove|cloneAsNode|detachAsNode] [scope=...]/>

My feeling is that integrating this into the property mediator will
make it too overloaded. We would almost need to include a decision
table into the documentation in order to explain to the user which
combinations of attributes and attribute values are allowed :-) We
should also make sure that we have the option (later) to provide an
XML schema for our configuration language and this schema should
provide a decent level of validation which is not possible with this
degree of overloading.

I would definitely prefer a distinct mediator (maybe <extract>?)
implementing clone and detach, as well as the remove operation
suggested below.

>>
>> For [3] and [4] I suggest we go for a single mediator called enrich with
>> the
>> following syntax.
>>
>> <enrich name="string" expression="xpath" action=["insertBefore" |
>> "insertAfter" | "replace"]/>
>>
>
> This looks good, I think we also need a slight variant mediator to just
> remove a node (i.e. without setting it as a property)
>
> cheers
> asankha
>
> --
> Asankha C. Perera
> AdroitLogic, http://adroitlogic.org
>
> http://esbmagic.blogspot.com
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to