On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 5:35 PM, esmiralha <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Hi Hiranya,
>
> You are right. My intention is to use Synapse as a proxy to demultiplex the
> messages to the proper client machines. No transformations whatsoever.
>

This can be implemented with Synapse. But I don't see a requirement to
maintain state information at Synapse.

Thanks,
Hiranya


>
> Thanks,
> Luiz
>
>
> Hiranya Jayathilaka-3 wrote:
> >
> > Hi Luiz,
> >
> > How exactly do you intend to use Synapse when implementing this scenario?
> > Synapse is a mediation engine. It usually resides between the server and
> > the
> > client. It can certainly mediate all the requests and responses related
> to
> > your application. But what part of your use case do you intend to
> > implement
> > using Synapse? Do you intend to use it as some kind of a load balancer
> > (that's one scenario where you'll have to be concerned about maintaining
> a
> > session)? Or may be apply some transformation etc?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Hiranya
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Luiz Esmiralha
> > <[email protected]>wrote:
> >
> >> This is my first question on the list and I'm a total newbie on
> >> Synapse. If the question doesn't make sense, please let me know!
> >>
> >> I'm wondering if the following use case can be implemented using
> Synapse:
> >>
> >> I have a performance test environment where multiple test clients can
> >> send/receive SOAP
> >> requests to/from a single server machine.
> >>
> >> The test scenario is like this:
> >>
> >> Client1 sends an "Open Order" SOAP request to Server.
> >> Server sends async reply to Client1.
> >> Server sends a SOAP request to Client1.
> >> Client1 sends async reply to the Server.
> >> Server sends an "Order Finished" SOAP request to Client1.
> >>
> >> The client requests are replied to asynchronously by the server. Each
> >> request spawns multiple exchanges between client and server that can
> >> be tied to the original request through an element of the message
> >> payload (the order id).
> >>
> >> Each async reply should be sent only to the client that originally
> >> sent the request.
> >>
> >> What I think I need is some sort of session context that is created
> >> when the order is sent and destroyed when the order is eventually
> >> closed. There I can store the endpoint URL of the client and route the
> >> messages accordingly. I thought about creating a Java class to serve
> >> as some sort of session context.
> >>
> >> Am I thinking right? Is this doable with Synapse without a large
> >> amount of Java code?
> >>
> >> Any help will be greatly appreciated!
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Luiz
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Hiranya Jayathilaka
> > Associate Technical Lead;
> > WSO2 Inc.;  http://wso2.org
> > E-mail: [email protected];  Mobile: +94 77 633 3491
> > Blog: http://techfeast-hiranya.blogspot.com
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/Session-context-spanning-multiple-SOAP-requests-tp32497167p32501064.html
> Sent from the Synapse - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>


-- 
Hiranya Jayathilaka
Associate Technical Lead;
WSO2 Inc.;  http://wso2.org
E-mail: [email protected];  Mobile: +94 77 633 3491
Blog: http://techfeast-hiranya.blogspot.com

Reply via email to