Hi Fabio,

I'm a bit confused. I'm already setting card_link with a user template on
staff_db sync. I have not set anything in the user template for carddb
sync. I have also tried populating the user with the derived card_link
attribute manually. Every time I've attempted a carddb sync, I've verified
that the derived attribute is shown on that user's record.

Thanks

On 23 March 2016 at 08:39, Fabio Martelli <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Martin, now it is clearer.
> I see from your logs you are trying to assign card_link attribute via a
> user template associated to carddb itself.
> This is not correct because carddb specify the account id on card_link:
> user template is evaluated after profile resolution.
>
> Maybe you can specify card_link attribute before by assigning a user
> template to ldap or staff_db sync.
> The user has to be populated yet with derived attribute card_link before
> running carddb sync.
>
> Please, try out in this sense and let me know.
> Kind regards,
> F.
>
>
> Il 22/03/2016 18:26, Martin Goldstone ha scritto:
>
>
> On 22 March 2016 at 16:38, Fabio Martelli <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Martin, resources and connectors configurations seem to be correct.
>> Provided logs are not useful: please, change debug level and perform a
>> new synchronization; collect logs and forward again.
>>
>
> Attached are new logs with the logging level turned up to debug for
> everything. The file sizes are quite large, would it be better if I repeat
> the task with reduced logging levels for certain loggers?
>
>
>>
>> Let's try to summarize...
>>
>>
>>    1. you have the provided configuration in place
>>    2. you created a (sample) new user providing card_link derived
>>    attribute for him
>>    3. you synchronized from carddb but no operation has been performed
>>    locally
>>
>> Right?
>>
> That's correct, yes. Card_link is assigned with the user template for the
> staff_db sync task, but I have also tried adding it manually.
>
>> Did you try out without propagation and synchronization action classes?
>>
> I've just taken out all propagation and synchronization action classes,
> there was no difference.
>
>
>
> --
> Martin Goldstone
> IT Systems Administrator
> IT Services, Innovation Centre 1 (IC1)
> Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, United Kingdom, ST5 5NB
> Telephone: +44 1782 734457
> G+: <http://google.com/+MartinGoldstoneKeele>
> http://google.com/+MartinGoldstoneKeele
>
>
>
> --
> Fabio 
> Martellihttps://it.linkedin.com/pub/fabio-martelli/1/974/a44http://blog.tirasa.net/author/fabio/index.html
>
> Tirasa - Open Source Excellencehttp://www.tirasa.net/
>
> Apache Syncope PMChttp://people.apache.org/~fmartelli/
>
>


-- 
Martin Goldstone
IT Systems Administrator
IT Services, Innovation Centre 1 (IC1)
Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, United Kingdom, ST5 5NB
Telephone: +44 1782 734457
G+: http://google.com/+MartinGoldstoneKeele

Reply via email to