Hi Adrian,
I need to understand what is your use case.
It seems to me that you are attempting to use Syncope for privilege
management, e.g. you want to:
1. enlist application privileges into Syncope
2. associate such privileges with some Syncope entity (I'd say you're
using roles, but groups should be more appropriate in this case)
3. write your application(s) authentication / authorization logic so
that it depends on Syncope's REST services and data (and you're using
Spring Security for this purpose)
Is this correct?
On 12/07/2016 12:16, Adrian Gonzalez wrote:
Hi Fabio,
I was thinking about creating my own apps (let's say PhotoGalleryApp).
With a service like :
@PreAuthorize("hasRole('photo.read')")
public Photo find(Long id) {
..bla
}
@PreAuthorize("hasRole('photo.update')")
public Photo update(Photo photo) {
..bla
}
}
This is really a basic sample (it won't be Cruds only).
How can I customize Syncope in order to have photo.read and
photo.update for instance ?
Moreover, I'm not at ease if customisation requires code modification
for each new entitlement since I'm gonna have a lot of apps.
Thanks for your insights,
Adrian
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*De :* Fabio Martelli <[email protected]>
*À :* [email protected]
*Envoyé le :* Mardi 12 juillet 2016 12h03
*Objet :* Re: Authorisation with Syncope 2.x
Il 11/07/2016 16:27, Adrian Gonzalez ha scritto:
Hello, Sorry once more :(
Hi Adrian, do not apologize.
Thank you, instead. Reporting and interaction in public ML is always
welcome.
See below for my comments.
Best regards,
F.
I would like to use Syncope in my app (using Spring Security) for
user authentication and authorisation.
I would like to know if mapping GrantedAuthority to Syncope's role is
the way to go ?
I'm a bit lost, since there's also the notion of entitlements and groups.
In fact, when I look into syncope's code, I see :
@PreAuthorize("hasRole('" + StandardEntitlement.ROLE_CREATE + "')")
public RoleTO create(final RoleTO roleTO) {
So I would say I should use entitlements and not roles.
You have to use the entitlements.
You can assign entitlements to a user by assigning them to a role and
a role to the user: the user owning that role will own those entitlements.
This is the standard for Apache Syncope.
Therefore you can think to add your own authorization method for some
customizations. Please, if you will do in this way do it carefully.
But entitlement appears to be fixed (in StandardEntitlement class)
and for syncope 'internal' use [1] and [2] (aka checking if user has
right to perform an action on syncope - and not checking if user has
right to peform action on whatever application).
Exactly! BTW you can perform some customization in order to extends
the set of entitlements in order to use them to authorize access to
some custom rest methods provided for your specific aims.
This customization is not simple but feasible if strongly required.
Thanks,
Adrian
P.S. Using Syncope 2.0.0-M2
[1]
http://syncope-user.1051894.n5.nabble.com/Entitlements-how-do-we-create-change-these-tp5707009p5707010.html
<quote>entitlements are not meant to be extended: their primary
purpose is to define security constraints on RESTful methods.</quote>
[2]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SYNCOPE/Authentication+and+authorization
--
Francesco Chicchiriccò
Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
http://www.tirasa.net/
Involved at The Apache Software Foundation:
member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC,
CXF Committer, OpenJPA Committer, PonyMail PPMC
http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
