On 03/03/2017 08:49, Mikael Ekblom wrote:

Hi,

Sorry, I don't get this last point: FYI, Syncope can be deployed and run in Windows environments too.

I was referring to the fact that it might be that we will jump over to deploy Syncope on some Linux-distribution. But as you said, it is deployed already on a Windows server and works fine.

What we need to check is how to connect to office365 PowerShell and automatically assign licenses through the IDM if possible.

Synchronization with Azure AD should work out of the box through sync with AD -> Azure AD connect , but assigning licenses is something else. This should also be role based. I must see what I can find for that or maybe write my own bundle


Now I understand, interesting.

FYI, verifying the connection with Office365 is on my (quite long ATM) TODO list, too :-)
Regards.

*From:*Francesco Chicchiriccò [mailto:[email protected]]
*Sent:* keskiviikko 1. maaliskuuta 2017 16.30
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: Creating a virtual schema type ->empty type list

On 01/03/2017 08:29, Mikael Ekblom wrote:

    Hi,

    OK, so that was the logic behind it!  Now I start to have all the
    dependencies clear.  Tested it and now everything makes sense.


That's great to hear.


    Our deployment is pretty small though. Only 200 + personnel + some
    2000 students. But I’ll check the postgress option. The core seems
    to be configured by default towards the Postgress option.


Yes, it is :-)


    I like the way you can augment Syncope if needed in a strongly
    typed language. Maybe we’ll even be able to remove the existing
    php-based “IDM”, which is more of a plain sync engine with no
    editable business logic capabilities what so ever. Not my
    production though…

    It might be that we will end up with a *nix environment in the end.


Sorry, I don't get this last point: FYI, Syncope can be deployed and run in Windows environments too.

Regards.


    *From:*Francesco Chicchiriccò [mailto:[email protected]]
    *Sent:* tiistai 28. helmikuuta 2017 17.54
    *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Subject:* Re: Creating a virtual schema type ->empty type list

    On 28/02/2017 16:26, Mikael Ekblom wrote:

        Hi,

        We are currently evaluating Syncopy as a candidate for our
        future IDM.


    Hi,
    glad to hear that :-)



        We have some choices on the table and we are even considering
        writing our own IDM from scratch, but that is something I
        would like to avoid for practical reasons…J I think that would
        be inventing the wheel again nowadays. Our neighbor Helsinki
        University is implementing the same solution, so I thought
        that I will join the community regarding this one.

        Anyhow, I have a working Syncopy 2.0.2 running on a Windows
        server 2012 R2 with mysql as the backbone. It is setup and
        configured via Apache Maven and is running with Tomcat 8.5 as
        the container.  Everything seems to be working.

        I have managed to create the connector to our AD with the
        built in/shipped connector. I have also assigned a resource to
        that connector. Via that resource, we will pull information
        from our AD as an initial test. The connector reports that it
        works.


    Very nice, indeed.

    One note: while it is perfectly fine for evaluation, I would
    personally prefer PostgreSQL over MySQL / MariaDB, as some of my
    customers have been reporting complaints about search performances.
    We have been constantly providing enhancements and fixes about
    that, but there have been simply no issues in all the
    PostgreSQL-based deployments - some of them being very large in
    numbers.



        One problem though. I have been able to create all schema
        types but the virtual one. When I’m supposed to create a
        virtual schema type for attributes that Syncope will not own
        and set the ad-resource as the  de facto resource, the type
        drop down list for the virtual schema is empty and just states
        “Choose one”.

        What am I missing here? Some schema definition topic missed
        somewhere? This is not a panic question, as we are just
        evaluating, but I figure that I might save some time to ask
        via the mailing list first. I do have my own abstractions to
        do for our own maybe to come IDM…J


    I am assuming you are using the Admin UI here.
    If so, you need first to select a Resource (among the ones
    available) and then the Type combo will be populated with all the
    provision rules defined for that Resource.
    Finally, you will need to provide the external attribute to which
    the new Virtual Schema's attributes will be linked.

    More details available at:

    https://syncope.apache.org/docs/reference-guide.html#virtual

    HTH
    Regards.

--
Francesco Chicchiriccò

Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
http://www.tirasa.net/

Member at The Apache Software Foundation
Syncope, Cocoon, Olingo, CXF, OpenJPA, PonyMail
http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/

Reply via email to