Hello Hyunsik,

Sorry. I was probably too quick to respond. I have not seen that you have 
already answered. It is probably still too early. I just got up. This 
documentation I already know.
In this documentation is described the fact that Tajo does not start a new 
thread when it knows about too small resources, correct?
Then I think it's misterious that it still worked a few hours before. I'll try 
out again in more detail. Many thanks.

Best regards,
Chris

On 18. September 2014 07:00:39 MESZ, Christian Schwabe 
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Hello Hyunsik,
>
>thanks anyway. One question is still unanswered. How To configure Tajo
>for parallel processing? I already describe in the post before this
>one. 
>
>Best regards,
>Chris
>
>On 18. September 2014 06:42:51 MESZ, Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>>iimissed one thing. I'd like to reserve your dinner when I visit
>German
>>someday :p
>>
>>Anyway, thank you for your interest in Tajo. Please keep going your
>>trials
>>with Tajo.
>>
>>Thanks!
>>
>>2014년 9월 18일 목요일, Christian Schwabe<[email protected]>님이 작성한
>>메시지:
>>
>>>
>>> Hello together,
>>>
>>> I am speechless. The query has been successfully completed. Running
>>time: 30
>>> minutes.
>>>
>>> I've done the following:
>>> git pull
>>> git clean -d -f
>>> git reset --hard
>>> patch -p0 < TAJO-1049_3.patch
>>>
>>> You are great. I'm very thankful.
>>> If you would live in Germany, I would invite you to dinner, all of
>>your
>>> team :-D
>>>
>>> It is now important for me to understand yet what is there now
>>happens in
>>> the background. In https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1048
>>Fixed
>>> the bug that the session variables have some parameters are not
>>> overwritten at run time, right?
>>> Difficult with the understanding it is at
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1049th What is the
>>limiting
>>> factor you have fixed it, which now apparently had this effect?
>>>
>>> In the just traversed test I noticed that only one task is
>processed.
>>I
>>> started just another run with the following configuration in
>>tajo-site.xml
>>> to use multiple cores:
>>>
>>> <configuration>
>>>     <property>
>>>       <name>tajo.resource-tracker.heartbeat.timeout-secs</name>
>>>       <value>240000</value>
>>>     </property>
>>>     <property>
>>>      
>><name>tajo.worker.resource.tajo.worker.resource.cpu-cores</name>
>>>       <value>4</value>
>>>     </property>
>>> </configuration>
>>>
>>> But the tasks are apparently still only processed serially by one
>>thread.
>>> Is this still an incorrect configuration due? Before the error was
>>not
>>> fixed, I had made ​​the same settings and determines the tasks were
>>> distributed on three cores with four selected cores.
>>>
>>> I would like to highlight particularly once: I am very grateful to
>>you. I
>>> very much hope that other interested persons in Tajo from our
>>discussions
>>> and the experience gained in this and also can learn from it.
>>>
>>> Warm regards and a thankful,
>>> Chris
>>>
>>> Am 17.09.2014 20:04:21, schrieb Hyunsik Choi:
>>>
>>> You don't need to apply TAJO-983.140916.patch. As I mentioned, this
>>> patch is still ongoing. You only need TAJO-1049_3.patch.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Hyunsik
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 2:45 AM, Christian Schwabe
>>> <[email protected] <#14885373167cb354_>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Hyunsik,
>>>
>>> Done. Same errors.
>>> No compilation possible.
>>>
>>> Warm regards,
>>> Chris
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 17.09.2014 um 19:05 schrieb Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]
>>> <#14885373167cb354_>>:
>>>
>>> Did you update and clean your git repository? In order to apply the
>>> submitted patches without conflict, you should use the latest and
>>> clean revision.
>>>
>>> In order to clean and update your revision, please type the
>following
>>> commands:
>>>
>>> git clean -d -f
>>> git reset --hard
>>> patch -p0 < filename.patch
>>>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Hyunsik
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 1:57 AM, Christian Schwabe
>>> <[email protected] <#14885373167cb354_>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Hyunsik,
>>>
>>> i read the bugs to this patch under the review.
>>> What i’ve done:
>>> -pull to the latest review
>>> -I applied the following patches:
>>>
>>> patch -p0 <TAJO-1049_3.patch
>>> patch -p0 <TAJO-983.140916.patch
>>>
>>> get the following output:
>>>
>>>
>>> christians-mbp:tajo chris$ patch -p0 <TAJO-983.140916.patch
>>> patching file
>>tajo-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/Fetcher.java
>>> Hunk #2 succeeded at 52 (offset -1 lines).
>>> Hunk #3 FAILED at 68.
>>> 1 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
>>> tajo-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/Fetcher.java.rej
>>> patching file
>>tajo-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/Task.java
>>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 48.
>>> Hunk #2 succeeded at 97 (offset 1 line).
>>> Hunk #3 succeeded at 197 (offset 1 line).
>>> Hunk #4 succeeded at 594 (offset 1 line).
>>> Hunk #5 succeeded at 639 (offset 1 line).
>>> Hunk #6 FAILED at 699.
>>> Hunk #7 succeeded at 754 (offset 2 lines).
>>> 2 out of 7 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
>>> tajo-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/Task.java.rej
>>> patching file
>>>
>>>
>>tajo-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/dataserver/retriever/FileChunk.java
>>> patching file
>>> tajo-core/src/test/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/TestFetcher.java
>>> Hunk #2 FAILED at 94.
>>> Hunk #3 FAILED at 140.
>>> Hunk #4 FAILED at 170.
>>> Hunk #5 FAILED at 204.
>>> Hunk #6 FAILED at 220.
>>> 5 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
>>> tajo-core/src/test/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/TestFetcher.java.rej
>>> patching file
>>>
>>>
>>tajo-yarn-pullserver/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/pullserver/TajoPullServerService.java
>>> patching file
>>>
>>>
>>tajo-yarn-pullserver/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/pullserver/retriever/FileChunk.java
>>> christians-mbp:tajo chris$ patch -p0 <TAJO-1049_3.patch
>>> patching file
>>>
>>tajo-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/master/querymaster/SubQuery.java
>>>
>>> Patchs seems to be applied correctly, despite the error.
>>>
>>> recompiled code with mvn clean package -DskipTests -Pdist -Dtar
>>> -Dhadoop.version=2.4.0 and get the following output — see attached
>>log from
>>> maven. Build process crashed.
>>>
>>> There seems to be something wrong. I hope i’ve done all right.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Warm regards,
>>> Chris
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 17.09.2014 um 16:39 schrieb Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]
>>> <#14885373167cb354_>>:
>>>
>>> Hi Chris,
>>>
>>> Do you mean that your query is finished well? Good to hear. But, you
>>> need to know that the patch still has some bugs. Please see the
>>review
>>> https://reviews.apache.org/r/25242/.
>>>
>>> If your problem is solved by this patch, your problem was related to
>>> Fetcher. I'm also expecting your problem is related to this issue
>>> (https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/141/files), which already
>>> committed to master branch. You can use this fix from master branch
>>> too.
>>>
>>> Please refer to this document in order to learn how to apply patch.
>>We
>>> mostly use '--no-prefix' option in order to generate patch files.
>So,
>>> you should use the patch command with -p0 instead of -p1 as follows:
>>>
>>> patch -p0 < ${PATCH_FILE}.patch
>>>
>>> By default, patch command uses -p1.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Hyunsik
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Christian Schwabe
>>> <[email protected] <#14885373167cb354_>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello guys,
>>>
>>> after days of efforts to apply the patch from May Hai, I finally be
>>able to
>>> announce a success today. I want to a brief description where the
>>problem
>>> was. The few guides out there to apply a patch, using the Git
>clients
>>often
>>> use git apply. However, I had no success. See discussion below.
>>>
>>> christians-mbp:tajo chris$ git apply --check
>>> /Users/chris/Desktop/TAJO-983.140916.patch
>>> error: src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/Fetcher.java: No such
>>file or
>>> directory
>>> error: src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/Task.java: No such file
>>or
>>> directory
>>> error:
>>>
>>src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/dataserver/retriever/FileChunk.java:
>>> No
>>> such file or directory
>>> error: src/test/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/TestFetcher.java: No
>such
>>file
>>> or directory
>>> error:
>>src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/pullserver/TajoPullServerService.java:
>>> No such file or directory
>>> error:
>>src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/pullserver/retriever/FileChunk.java:
>>> No
>>> such file or directory
>>>
>>> ###########################################
>>>
>>> christians-mbp:tajo chris$ git apply --check
>>> /Users/chris/Desktop/TAJO-983.140916.patch
>>> error: src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/Fetcher.java: No such
>>file or
>>> directory
>>> error: src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/Task.java: No such file
>>or
>>> directory
>>> error:
>>>
>>src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/dataserver/retriever/FileChunk.java:
>>> No
>>> such file or directory
>>> error: src/test/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/TestFetcher.java: No
>such
>>file
>>> or directory
>>> error:
>>src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/pullserver/TajoPullServerService.java:
>>> No such file or directory
>>> error:
>>src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/pullserver/retriever/FileChunk.java:
>>> No
>>> such file or directory
>>>
>>> ###########################################
>>>
>>> christians-mbp:tajo chris$ git apply -v --check
>>> /Users/chris/Desktop/TAJO-983.140916.patch
>>> Checking patch src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/Fetcher.java...
>>> error: src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/Fetcher.java: No such
>>file or
>>> directory
>>> Checking patch src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/Task.java...
>>> error: src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/Task.java: No such file
>>or
>>> directory
>>> Checking patch
>>>
>>src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/dataserver/retriever/FileChunk.java...
>>> error:
>>>
>>src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/dataserver/retriever/FileChunk.java:
>>> No
>>> such file or directory
>>> Checking patch
>>src/test/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/TestFetcher.java...
>>> error: src/test/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/TestFetcher.java: No
>such
>>file
>>> or directory
>>> Checking patch
>>>
>>src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/pullserver/TajoPullServerService.java...
>>> error:
>>src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/pullserver/TajoPullServerService.java:
>>> No such file or directory
>>> Checking patch
>>> src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/pullserver/retriever/FileChunk.java...
>>> error:
>>src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/pullserver/retriever/FileChunk.java:
>>> No
>>> such file or directory
>>>
>>> ###########################################
>>>
>>> christians-mbp:tajo-core chris$ git apply
>>> /Users/chris/Desktop/TAJO-983.140916.patch
>>> /Users/chris/Desktop/TAJO-983.140916.patch:58: trailing whitespace.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> /Users/chris/Desktop/TAJO-983.140916.patch:80: trailing whitespace.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> /Users/chris/Desktop/TAJO-983.140916.patch:487: trailing whitespace.
>>> return " (start=" + startOffset() + ", length=" + length + ",
>>> fromRemote=" + fromRemote
>>> warning: 3 lines add whitespace errors.
>>>
>>> ###########################################
>>>
>>> Removal of whitespaces also brought no success.
>>> My hope depended least on this patch. As far Tajo not run in my
>>environment
>>> and my standard configuration, I will unfortunately have to complete
>>my
>>> thesis with the result that it is currently not suitable for
>>practical use.
>>> This really is not a reproach to formulate that clear again. I
>really
>>do
>>> appreciate your hard work very much. However, I also think it's
>>slightly
>>> doubtful that the advice you have given can't read anywhere and only
>>> inquired. I think that's still a pity. Surely you can not really
>>expect, or
>>> rather the can but not really your goal to be always be the first
>>point of
>>> contact. I think at this point there is still a lot of catching up
>to
>>do.
>>> This is still a large deficit. Surely you can not really expect, or
>>rather
>>> it is hopefully not really your goal to be always be the first point
>>of
>>> contact. I think at this point there is still a lot of catching up
>to
>>do.
>>>
>>> I am not come within the scope of my thesis within the time to the
>>desired
>>> goal, but of course I'm still interested in a close contact with you
>>and
>>> and
>>> a further effort to solve the outstanding problem.
>>>
>>> Until I have encountered the following with the patch was
>>successfully
>>> carried out. Unfortunately, this patch did not bring the hoped
>>solution. No
>>> change in the behavior described herein. Are there any other ideas
>>that I
>>> could try to fix the problem?
>>>
>>> I really thank you very much for your support thus far. I really
>>thank you
>>> very much for your support thus far. I really thank you very much
>for
>>your
>>> support thus far. I really thank you very much for your support thus
>>far. I
>>> really thank you very much for your support thus far. I really thank
>>you
>>> very much for your support thus far. I really thank you very much
>for
>>your
>>> support thus far. I really thank you very much for your support thus
>>far.
>>> ;-)
>>>
>>>
>>> christians-mbp:tajo chris$ cd tajo-yarn-pullserver/
>>> christians-mbp:tajo-yarn-pullserver chris$ patch -p1 <
>>> ../TAJO-983.140916.patch
>>> can't find file to patch at input line 5
>>> Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>>> The text leading up to this was:
>>> --------------------------
>>> |diff --git
>>tajo-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/Fetcher.java
>>> tajo-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/Fetcher.java
>>> |index 64475fe..7310736 100644
>>> |--- tajo-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/Fetcher.java
>>> |+++ tajo-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/Fetcher.java
>>> --------------------------
>>> File to patch:
>>> Skip this patch? [y] y
>>> Skipping patch.
>>> 6 out of 6 hunks ignored
>>> can't find file to patch at input line 98
>>> Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>>> The text leading up to this was:
>>> --------------------------
>>> |diff --git tajo-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/Task.java
>>> tajo-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/Task.java
>>> |index 7b4cbe1..ecc4078 100644
>>> |--- tajo-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/Task.java
>>> |+++ tajo-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/Task.java
>>> --------------------------
>>> File to patch: y
>>> y: No such file or directory
>>> Skip this patch? [y] y
>>> Skipping patch.
>>> 7 out of 7 hunks ignored
>>> can't find file to patch at input line 339
>>> Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>>> The text leading up to this was:
>>> --------------------------
>>> |diff --git
>>>
>>>
>>tajo-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/dataserver/retriever/FileChunk.java
>>>
>>>
>>tajo-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/dataserver/retriever/FileChunk.java
>>> |index 4f11168..911c0c2 100644
>>> |---
>>>
>>>
>>tajo-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/dataserver/retriever/FileChunk.java
>>> |+++
>>>
>>>
>>tajo-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/dataserver/retriever/FileChunk.java
>>> --------------------------
>>> File to patch: y
>>> y: No such file or directory
>>> Skip this patch? [y] y
>>> Skipping patch.
>>> 1 out of 1 hunk ignored
>>> can't find file to patch at input line 362
>>> Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>>> The text leading up to this was:
>>> --------------------------
>>> |diff --git
>>tajo-core/src/test/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/TestFetcher.java
>>> tajo-core/src/test/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/TestFetcher.java
>>> |index b755e02..cb19d54 100644
>>> |--- tajo-core/src/test/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/TestFetcher.java
>>> |+++ tajo-core/src/test/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/TestFetcher.java
>>> --------------------------
>>> File to patch: y
>>> y: No such file or directory
>>> Skip this patch? [y] y
>>> Skipping patch.
>>> 6 out of 6 hunks ignored
>>> patching file
>>> src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/pullserver/TajoPullServerService.java
>>> patching file
>>> src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/pullserver/retriever/FileChunk.java
>>> christians-mbp:tajo-yarn-pullserver chris$ pwd
>>> /Users/chris/6_Semester/Thesis/07_git/tajo/tajo-yarn-pullserver
>>>
>>>
>>> Warm regards,
>>> Chris
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>

Reply via email to